Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Caribbean Knights

Quijote, Galahad, and the Telling of History

Bibliographic Data

ID11807372
AuthorsTimothy J Reiss (corresponding author), Fazal Rahim (0000-0002-0555-1595), Xie Yan, Jawad Ali Shah (0000-0002-0339-4370), Nida Bibi, Zafar Ullah Khan (0000-0003-3276-3005), Shah Nawaz (0000-0003-4337-1453), Yao Ming (0000-0003-4260-530X)
Year1997
Volume29
Issue3
Pages297-773
Publication date1997-09-22
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in the novel (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0039-3827 • E-ISSN: 1934-1512
PublisherUniversity of North Texas Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.12688/f1000research.121712.2
OpenAlexW37867626
LanguageEN
References cited25

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a life-threatening ailment caused by diabetes. Several growth factors, as well as their various combinations, have shown promising effect in aiding diabetic foot ulcer healing. However, contradictory or paradoxical results are often available, and debates about this issue are ongoing. Therefore, a comprehensive meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and placebo in healing diabetic foot ulcers. Methods: The database search included relevant English literature from Cochrane Library, PubMed, Google Scholar, Elsevier, and EMBASE that was published between 2009 and 2021. Inclusion criteria included type 1 and 2 diabetic patients with foot wounds focusing on complete healing rate. Exclusion criteria included combined therapy, non-human studies, reviews, and protocols. To assess the quality of each study, biases regarding random sequence generation, allocation concealment, participant and personnel blinding, outcome assessment blinding and incomplete outcome data were thoroughly identified. Results: Eight randomized control trials comprising 620 patients (337 in EGF group, 283 in placebo group), were included in this meta-analysis. EGF achieved a significantly higher complete healing rate than placebo after four weeks of treatment, with relative risk (RR): 3.04 (0.50, 18.44) and heterogeneity (Chi 2 = 6.46, df = 2 (P = 0.04) I 2 = 69 %). Notably, the healing frequency in the placebo group was 17%, whereas the healing frequency in the epidermal growth factor group was 34%. Likewise, after eight weeks of treatment, the relative risk and heterogeneity were RR: 2.59 (1.42, 4.72) and (Chi 2 =7.92, df= 4 (p= 0.09): I 2 = 49%), respectively. Moreover, the risk ratio at 12 weeks was RR: 1.01 (0.42, 2.46), and heterogeneity was (Chi 2 =8.55, df= 2 (p= 0.01): I 2 = 77%). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that EGF significantly promotes wound healing, and could be recommended as an effective and safe treatment for DFUs

Ancient history · Art · Extant taxon · Genealogy · Humanities · Hispanic-African Historical Relations · History · Literature, Magical Realism, García Márquez · Philippine History and Culture

  • Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045

    Open Access•Pouya Saeedi, Inga Petersohn et al.•Diabetes Research and Clinical…•2019

  • The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions

    Open Access•A Liberati, D G Altman et al.•BMJ•2009

  • The World and The Word

    J Michael Dash•Callaloo•1988

  • Books of the Brave

    Carl Bridenbaugh, Irving A Leonard•The William and Mary Quarterly•1950

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae