Revenge of the Nerds

Xenophanes, Euripides, and Socrates vs. Olympic Victors

Bibliographic Data

ID11828512
AuthorsJohn P Harris (0000-0002-3191-5209, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume130
Issue2
Pages157-194
Publication date2009-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe American Journal of Philology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-9475 • E-ISSN: 1086-3168
PublisherJohns Hopkins University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/ajp.0.0052
OpenAlexW1974390665
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited37

Xenophanes (fr. 2) and Euripides (fr. 282) disapprove of the pan-Hellenic custom of granting athletes conspicuous honors, and Xenophanes in particular, with that of publicly funded meals. Both contrast the uselessness of athletes with the civic contributions of σοφοί. Socrates echoes these sentiments in his counter-proposal that he is much more deserving of σίτησιϚ ἐν πρυτανείῳ than any Olympic athlete (Pl. Ap. 36b3-37a2). I suggest that Socrates deliberately evokes this topos , but does so with a twist: whereas the earlier passages base their claim to honors on σοφία, Socrates deliberately deprives σοφία of its popular meaning, imbuing it with a much more humble and Delphic connotation, thereby making his proposal all the more outrageous

Art · Athletes · Connotation · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literature · Meaning (existential · Original meaning · SOCRATES · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub