Stoic Caricature in Lucian’s De astrologia

The inclusion of De astrologia in the Lucianic corpus has been disputed for centuries since it appears to defend astrological practices that Lucian elsewhere undercuts. This paper argues for Lucian’s authorship by illustrating its masterful subversion of a captatio benevolentiae and subtle rejection of Stoic astrological practices. The narrator begins the text by blaming phony astrologers and their erroneous predictions for inciting others to “denounce the stars and hate astrology” (ἄστρων τε κατηγοροῦσιν καὶ αὐτὴν στρολογίην μισέουσιν, 2). The narrator assures readers that he, the knowledgeable astrologer, will correct for the “stupidity and laziness” (μαθίῃ καὶ ῥαθυμίῃ, ibid.) that bring about false predictions. The narrator’s credibility quickly decays when he attempts to recast Orpheus, Bellerophon, Icarus, Daedalus, and a host of other mythological figures as Greek astrologers. Lucian’s audience would expect such far-fetched interpretations of myth from the stereotypical Stoic philosopher, a character lampooned elsewhere in the Lucianic corpus

Art · Astrology · Character (mathematics · Comedy · Greek mythology · Literature · Mythology · Stupidity · Subversion · Verisimilitude · Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History · Classical Antiquity Studies · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · Philosophy · Psychology

• Inventing Origins? Aetiological Thinking in Greek and Roman Antiquity

  Open Access•Antje Wessels, Jacqueline Klooster•Inventing Origins? Aetiological…•2021

  Add to list

• Unruly Eloquence

  R Bracht Branham•Unruly Eloquence•1989

  Add to list

• Stoicorum veterum fragmenta

  Hans von Arnim•Stoicorum veterum fragmenta•1978

  Add to list

• A New View of Early Greek Astronomy

  Bernard R Goldstein, Alan C Bowen•Isis•1983

  Add to list