Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Chirotherium herculis ’—Problems posed by the first finds

Bibliographic Data

ID11877925
AuthorsGeoffrey Tresise (a Liverpool Museum: National Museums and Galleries on Merseyside , William Brown Street, Liverpool, L3 8EN, U.K., corresponding author)
Year1991
Volume48
Issue6
Pages565-576
Publication date1991-11-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnnals of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-3790 • E-ISSN: 1464-505X
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00033799100200451
OpenAlexW2074077977
LanguageEN
References cited3

In 1838, Sir Philip Egerton described a new type of fossil footprint from the Triassic sandstones of Tarporley, Cheshire, which he called Chirotherium herculis. The following year he reported a second find of the same type of footprints in Chester. The subsequent history of the Tarporley footprints is outlined and the possibility that two footprints from the second find are included in the collections of the Grosvenor Museum, Chester, is considered. The existence of a tracing made in 1839 when the footprints were found provides proof that they do not correspond to the Grosvenor Museum's specimens

Astronomy · Physics · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies · Philosophy · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae