How does delegating decisions to communities affect the provision and use of a public service? Evidence from a field experiment in Bangladesh
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11890010 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Malgosia Madajewicz (0000-0003-2585-0338, Columbia University, autor de correspondencia), Anna Tompsett (0000-0002-5415-6583, Stockholm University), Md Ahasan Habib (0000-0001-8844-5001, KTH Royal Institute of Technology) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 150 |
| Páginas | 102609-102609 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-01-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Development Economics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0304-3878 • E-ISSN: 1872-6089 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102609 |
| OpenAlex | W3122041580 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 10 |
| Referencias citadas | 28 |
Most development practitioners would list engaging communities in the provision of public services among best practices for improving access. However, whether community participation enhances provision and use of public services relative to a non-participatory approach is largely unknown because few studies compare impacts when the same public service intervention is implemented with and without community participation. This field experiment compares three approaches to providing safe water in rural Bangladesh. Delegating decisions to the community increases use of safe water by about 80% relative to a top-down provider making the same decisions but only when the approach to delegating decisions limits elite influence
Affect (linguistics · Business · Citizen journalism · Economics · Elite · Intervention (counseling · Political science · Public economics · Public relations · Public service · Service (business · Service provider · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Medicine · Nursing · Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare · Psychology · Urban and Rural Development Challenges · Marketing
Disaster risk reduction for whom? The gap between centrally planned Disaster Management Program and people's risk perception and adaptation
The Political Economy of Donor Control and Elite Capture in Arsenic Mitigation in Bangladesh
Spatially heterogeneous and neighborhood impacts of deep tubewells on childhood diarrhea in rural Bangladesh
Public participation and distributional equity of government spending
How city shrinkage affect public service provision for disadvantaged groups? Evidence from China
Effective community mobilization
Investigating the impact of multidimensional management on the willingness of villagers to protect the ecosystems and avoiding rural–urban migration
Does information about citizen participation initiatives increase political trust
Decentralization, social connections and primary health care
Pathways from research to sustainable development
Results on the bias and inconsistency of ordinary least squares for the linear probability model
Can Development Aid Contribute to Social Cohesion after Civil War? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Post-Conflict Liberia
School governance, teacher incentives, and pupil–teacher ratios
Power to the People
Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data
Reshaping Institutions
Targeting the Poor
Pitfalls of Participatory Programs
Worms
How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?
Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects
Fast-Track Institution Building in Conflict-Affected Countries? Insights from Recent Field Experiments
Exporting democratic practices
Direct democracy and resource allocation
Monitoring Corruption
Outside Funding and the Dynamics of Participation in Community Associations
Local Democracy in South Asia
Anomalies
International Interventions to Build Social Capital
How Does Development Assistance Affect Collective Action Capacity? Results from a Field Experiment in Post-Conflict Liberia
Direct Democracy and Local Public Goods
Social Network Structures and the Politics of Public Goods Provision
| Obras citantes distintas | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 10 |