Carnophallogocentrism and Eco-Deconstruction

Whether deconstruction is relevant to environmental philosophy, and if so, in what ways and with what transformations, has been subject to considerable debate in recent years. I will begin by discussing some reservations regarding deconstruction’s relevance to environmental thought, and argue that they stem from an older misreading of Derrida’s work in particular as hostile to the natural sciences, and as a cultural textualism of relevance only to the interiority of a traditional canon, but unable to reach the materiality of the outside environment. This attempt at refutation will permit a better understanding of the deconstructive argument for what has been called an ‘originary environmentality’ of life. On this basis, I seek to argue that deconstruction tends to be most promising to environmental questions when it shows responses to the call, not primarily for a new ethics, but for far-ranging analyses of our conception of politics. The reason for this lies in the overall deconstructive goal of exposing political and legal sovereignty, including its modern democratic understanding, to what I will elaborate as contextual or environmental finitude

Aesthetics · Argument (complex analysis · Deconstruction (building · Democracy · Environmental ethics · Environmental philosophy · Epistemology · Materiality (auditing · Natural (archaeology · Political science · Politics · Relevance (law · Sociology · Sovereignty · Subject (documents · Computer Science · Environmental Philosophy and Ethics · History · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics