Famine and the two faces of entitlement
A comment on Sen
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11912741 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Getachew Woldemeskel (Uppsala University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1990 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 491-495 |
| Publication date | 1990-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | World Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0305-750X • E-ISSN: 1873-5991 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/0305-750x(90)90133-i |
| OpenAlex | W2060697425 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 6 |
Argument (complex analysis · Causation · Confusion · Economics · Entitlement (fair division · Famine · Individuation · Law and economics · Microeconomics · Neoclassical economics · Political science · Positive economics · Possession (linguistics · Sociology · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Law · Philosophy · Psychology
Entitlement relations and ‘unruly’ social practices
The Entitlement Approach
The Precarious State of Famine Research
What Do Amartya Sen, the Great Depression and the Screwball Comedy My Man Godfrey Have in Common
Sen's Entitlement Approach
The politics of food and starvation
Drought and survival in rural Namibia
Entitlements Analysis
| Citations per year | 0.24 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1993 - 2020 (28) |
| Highly cited | No |