Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Role of Cognitive and Occupational Differentiation in Scientific Controversies

Bibliographic Data

ID11924285
AuthorsDavid Robbins (0000-0002-2939-1573, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK, corresponding author), Ron Johnston (0000-0003-3031-8573, Department of Liberal Studies in Science, The University, Mancester, M13 9PL, UK)
Year1976
Volume6
Issue3-4
Pages349-368
Publication date1976-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Studies of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-3127 • E-ISSN: 1460-3659
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/030631277600600304
OpenAlexW2088144830
LanguageEN
Citations received20
References cited3

The involvement of science in matters of public importance is not a new development. R.K. Merton's study of the Royal Society in 17th century England' depicts a group of scientists intimately concerned with the application of science to matters of public concern. Nevertheless, for a considerable period science remained a relatively isolated and uninfluential sub-culture of society. However, along with the growth of science witnessed in this century, both in terms of government support and numbers of scientists, there has been a widespread increase in the involvement of scientists in public affairs.2 By the 1930s some scientists were actively seeking channels by which they could become involved, as scientists, in the political process. Werskey3 has described the activities of 'reformist' and 'radical' scientists of this era in 'insider' and 'outsider' politics.4 Also from this era came Bernal's5 plea for a planned science responsive to social needs. This concern with the public role of science, coupled with the dramatic rise in the status of the scientific profession that resulted from its war-time achievements, provided the basis for an ever growing post-war involvement of scientists in social and political affairs. In the realm of 'technical' policymaking, politicians and government bodies actively sought the advice of scientists. For their part, scientists showed an increasing willingness to become involved

Environmental ethics · Government (linguistics · Insider · Plea · Political science · Politics · Realm · Social science · Sociology · World War II · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Law

  • Policy as Theory

    Open Access•Stuart Blume, Stuart S Blume•Acta Sociologica•1977

  • The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts

    Open Access•Trevor Pinch, Trevor J Pinch et al.•Social Studies of Science•1984

  • The Social Construction of Validity in Estimates of US Crude Oil Reserves

    Open Access•Gary Bowden•Social Studies of Science•1985

  • The Problem of Relevant Collectivities

    Open Access•Richard Dunford, Richard W Dunford•Social Studies of Science•1985

  • The Origins of the American Scientific Debate over Fallout Hazards

    Open Access•Carolyn Kopp•Social Studies of Science•1979

  • The Construction of Expert Advice on Health Risks

    Open Access•José Van Eijndhoven, Peter Groenewegen•Social Studies of Science•1991

  • Controlling Technology

    Open Access•Ron Johnston•Social Studies of Science•1984

  • Litigation Life

    Open Access•Gary Edmond, David Mercer•Social Studies of Science•2000

  • Negotiation and accommodation in expert medical risk assessment and regulation

    Open Access•John Abraham•Policy Sciences•1994

  • On the Relevance of the “Genetics‐Based” Approach to Medicine for Sociological Perspectives on Medical Specialization

    Open Access•William Leeming•Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue…•2007

  • Tracing the shifting sands of ‘medical genetics’

    Open Access•William Leeming•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2010

  • Graphical and Computationally Intensive Techniques for Presenting and Disseminating Information About the Genetics of Disease

    Open Access•William Leeming•Science Communication•2011

  • Work Setting, Publication, and Scientific Responsibility

    Open Access•David A Rier•Science Communication•2003

  • Author's Response

    Open Access•Mark E Rushefsky•Politics and the Life Sciences•1985

  • Toward a comparative history of medical genetics as a medical specialty in North America

    Open Access•William Leeming•History & Philosophy of the Life…•2022

  • The science of value

    Open Access•Katherine Hood•Social Studies of Science•2017

  • Scientific Expertise in Technological Controversies

    Open Access•Jobst Conrad•International Political Science…•1982

  • The Sociology of the Fluoridation Controversy

    Open Access•Brian Martins•Sociological Quarterly•1989

  • Dependency and Compliance in Academic Research Infrastructures

    Open Access•Yehouda Shenhav, Yehouda A Shenhav•Sociological Perspectives•1986

  • "Professionalization theory, medical specialists and the concept of "national patterns of specialization

    Open Access•William Leeming•Social Science Information•2001

  • The Sociology of the Professions

    Open Access•Philip Elliott•The Sociology of the Professions•1972

  • The structure of scientific revolutions

    Dennis Holland, Thomas S Kuhn•La Structure des révolutions…•1976

  • The Social Process of Innovation

    Open Access•Michael Mulkay, M J Mulkay•The Social Process of Innovation•1972

Unique citing works20
Citations per year0,41
Citation span1977 - 2022 (46)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 20

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae