Private Science and Public Knowledge
The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of the Claims of the Paranormal and its Use of the Literature
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11924331 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Trevor Pinch (0000-0001-6938-2199, University of York, corresponding author), T J Pinch (University of York), H M Collins (Science Studies Centre, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.), Harry Collins (0000-0003-2909-9035) |
| Year | 1984 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 521-546 |
| Publication date | 1984-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Studies of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0306-3127 • E-ISSN: 1460-3659 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/030631284014004002 |
| OpenAlex | W2080699465 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 20 |
| References cited | 3 |
The scientific literature can be used to construct facts or to deconstruct them. The formal journals construct by presenting maximally `demodalized' accounts of experiment. The more popular journals are licensed to present more than this, but usually, where they do provide contingent details of scientists' work, these are details of life away from the laboratory bench. Sometimes, popular journals use their license to present contingent details of work at the laboratory bench, and this has a deconstructing effect on the scientific results presented. This analysis emerges from a consideration of the role of the literature from an active `construction of scientific knowledge' perspective. The work of the `Committee for the Scientific Investigation of the Claims of the Paranormal' and its journal are then analyzed with these themes in mind. The Committee sometimes presents itself as revealing the results of its own experiments, and sometimes uses its journal to deconstruct others' work. The cases of `Remote Viewing' and the astrological `Mars Effect' are discussed. The analysis bears out the `active' view as regards the scientific literature. Also, members of the Committee are seen to take up the active view as their experience of controversial science grows
Alternative medicine · Construct (python library · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · License · Paranormal · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Sociology of scientific knowledge · Work (physics · Computer Science · Engineering · Law · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs · Philosophy · Psychology · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life · Artificial Intelligence
When scientists turn to the public
“For Those Who Are Not Afraid of the Future”
Ufology as Anthropology
Television's Nova and the construction of scientific truth
A social anthropology of ghosts in twenty-first-century America
Sociology of scientific knowledge and science education part 2
Psychical research in the history and philosophy of science. An introduction and review
Discovering Sex
Psychical research and the origins of American psychology
Rejecting knowledge claims inside and outside science
A Critical Examination of the New Sociology of Science Part 2
Sexual chemistry’ before the Pill
Sovereignty and the UFO
A Bounded Affinity Theory of Religion and the Paranormal
Molecular Detector (Non)Technology in Mexico
Puck in the Laboratory
Toward a Militant Ethnography of Infrastructure
Manifesting Spirits
Between Electricity and Spirit
Redefining Rationality
| Unique citing works | 20 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,56 |
| Citation span | 1990 - 2019 (30) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 20 |