Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Crackpots’ and ‘active researchers’

The controversy over links between arXiv and the scientific blogosphere

Bibliographic Data

ID11924464
AuthorsSophie Ritson (0000-0003-3596-307X, Unit for the History and Philosophy of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume46
Issue4
Pages607-628
Publication date2016-06-07
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Studies of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-3127 • E-ISSN: 1460-3659
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0306312716647508
PMID28948876
OpenAlexW2418363117
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited31

Controversies over string theory (collectively termed the 'string wars') intensified in 2005. Also in that year, the open-access preprint publisher arXiv instituted a new feature called a 'trackback'. This new feature enabled authors of blog posts discussing a paper on arXiv to leave a trackback (a link) to the post on the paper's abstract page on arXiv. The determination of which specific bloggers would have access to the feature generated a public controversy that was played out in the blogosphere. Although the community was in almost unanimous agreement that so-called 'crackpots' should not have access to the trackback feature, it was unable to reach a consensus as to how to define a 'crackpot' or an 'active researcher'. Blogs may provide a window into science in the making, yet this study shows that blogs confound categorization as permanent or ephemeral scholarly communication. The trackback feature was originally conceived to develop certain blog discourse as an alternative or complementary form of peer review. However, the high-energy physics community as a whole questions the ongoing function of the blog

Blogosphere · Categorization · Feature (linguistics · Function (biology · Internet privacy · Linguistics · Physics · Preprint · Sociology · String (physics · The Internet · World Wide Web · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Research Data Management Practices · Scientific Computing and Data Management · Artificial Intelligence

  • Sorting on arXiv

    Open Access•Sergio Sismondo•Social Studies of Science•2016

  • Zoonati’ vs. ‘epistemic tresspasers’

    Open Access•Lynn Horton•Social Studies of Science•2024

  • Mouth work

    Ella Butler•Food Culture & Society•2019

  • Sensory labor

    Claire Spackman, Jacob Lahne•Food Culture & Society•2019

  • The future(s) of open science

    Open Access•Philip Mirowski•Social Studies of Science•2018

  • Feyerabend and manufactured disagreement

    Open Access•Jamie Shaw•Synthese•2021

  • Hell Is Truth Seen Too Late

    Philip Mirowski•boundary 2•2019

  • Public Science in a Wired World

    Open Access•Sarah R Davies, Noriko Hara•Science Communication•2017

  • Making Value Out of Ethics

    Michael J Mouat, R Prince et al.•Economic Geography•2019

  • Cultural Boundaries of Science

    Thomas F Gieryn•Cultural Boundaries of Science•1998

  • Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology

    Massimiano Bucc, Bruce V Lewenstein et al.•Handbook of public communication…•2008

  • Science Blogging

    Hauke Riesch, Jonathan Mendel•Science as Culture•2013

  • Scientific Journal Publications

    Open Access•Kristrún Gunnarsdóttir•Social Studies of Science•2005

  • Rejecting knowledge claims inside and outside science

    Open Access•Harry Collins•Social Studies of Science•2014

  • On the Conflicting Assessments of the Current Status of String Theory

    Open Access•Richard Dawid•Philosophy of Science•2009

  • Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science

    Thomas F Gieryn•American Sociological Review•1983

Citations per year0.9
Citation span2016 - 2024 (9)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae