Survivors and scientists
Hiroshima, Fukushima, and the Radiation Effects Research Foundation, 1975–2014
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11924490 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Susan Lindee (University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 184-209 |
| Publication date | 2016-03-09 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Studies of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0306-3127 • E-ISSN: 1460-3659 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0306312716632933 |
| PMID | 27263236 |
| OpenAlex | W2319341325 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 50 |
In this article, I reflect on the Radiation Effects Research Foundation and its ongoing studies of long-term radiation risk. Originally called the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (1947-1975), the Radiation Effects Research Foundation has carried out epidemiological research tracking the biomedical effects of radiation at Hiroshima and Nagasaki for almost 70 years. Radiation Effects Research Foundation scientists also played a key role in the assessment of populations exposed at Chernobyl and are now embarking on studies of workers at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. I examine the role of estimating dosimetry in post-disaster epidemiology, highlight how national identity and citizenship have mattered in radiation risk networks, and track how participants interpreted the relationships between nuclear weapons and nuclear energy. Industrial interests in Japan and the United States sought to draw a sharp line between the risks of nuclear war and the risks of nuclear power, but the work of the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (which became the basis of worker protection standards for the industry) and the activism of atomic bomb survivors have drawn these two nuclear domains together. This is so particularly in the wake of the Fukushima disaster, Japan's 'third atomic bombing'. The Radiation Effects Research Foundation is therefore a critical node in a complex global network of scientific institutions that adjudicate radiation risk and proclaim when it is present and when absent. Its history, I suggest, can illuminate some properties of modern disasters and the many sciences that engage with them
Commission · Foundation (evidence · Nuclear physics · Nuclear power · Nuclear warfare · Nuclear weapon · Physics · Political science · Law · Radiation Dose and Imaging · Radioactive contamination and transfer · Risk Perception and Management
The Politics of Radiation Protection
WHO’s Right to Health
Circulez, il n’y a rien à voir
Strategic science performance and the illusion of consensus about Fukushima’s health effects
Healing Fukushima
Resilience in Fukushima
Human genetics after the bomb
Peaceful atoms in Japan
Measuring the Particular
Nuclear governmentality
Making sense of nuclear natures
Protective abandonment
Risk Society
Technoscience and Environmental Justice
The Challenger Launch Decision
Life Exposed
Exposed Science
Toxic Exposures
The Nuclear Borderlands
Ghostly Matters
Chain Reaction
Suffering Made Real
The Disaster Experts
Dynamics of Disaster
Cover-up of the effects of internal exposure by residual radiation from the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Disaster
Introduction
Global Regulation
Delayed effects of A-bomb radiation
Twice invisible
Underlying Yucca Mountain
The Dragon's Tail
The American Journal of Human Genetics
The Atomic Energy Commission and the Politics of Radiation Protection, 1967-1971
Risk society
The Atomic Bomb Suppressed
The Power of Nuclear Things
The Semblance of Transparency
Advocacy after Bhopal
Nuclear Power and Its Critics
| Citations per year | 1.09 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Highly cited | No |