Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

In defence of Marxology

A reply to Meghnad Desai's review of T. Shanin et al. , Late Marx and the Russian road

Bibliographic Data

ID11926964
AuthorsDerek Sayer (0009-0000-8056-6810, University of Alberta, corresponding author)
Year1987
Volume14
Issue3
Pages406-410
Publication date1987-04-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Peasant Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-6150 • E-ISSN: 1743-9361
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03066158708438337
OpenAlexW2130774184
LanguageEN
Citations received1

This note defends T. Shanin et al., Late Marx and the Russian Road against the criticism levelled by Meghnad Desai in a previous issue of The Journal of Peasant Studies. It is argued that the ‘late Marx’ – as represented in Marx's four drafts of his letter to Vera Zasulich of March, 1881 – and Russian populism address issues that are crucial to contemporary socialist politics, both on the ‘periphery’ of capitalism and elsewhere

Capitalism · Criticism · Economic history · Economics · Peasant · Political science · Politics · Populism · Sociology · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Law · Political Economy and Marxism · Political theory and Gramsci

  • The 'peasant problem' in the Russian revolution(s), 1905-1929

    Henry Bernstein•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2018

Citations per year0.13
Citation span2018 - 2018 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae