Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does the current trade liberalization agenda contribute to greenhouse gas emission mitigation in agriculture

Bibliographic Data

ID11932262
AuthorsTorbjörn Jansson (0000-0002-1005-5676, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences), Mihály Himics (0000-0003-3923-9898, University of Bonn, corresponding author), Thomas Fellmann (0000-0002-4798-329X, Joint Research Center), Jesús Barreiro-Hurlé (0000-0002-6422-6047, Joint Research Center), Peter Witzke (0000-0001-6237-8031), Heinz-Peter Witzke, Ignácio Pérez Domínguez (0000-0002-0279-6263, Joint Research Center), Franz Weiß (0000-0002-8021-1259, Joint Research Centre)
Year2018
Volume76
Pages120-129
Publication date2018-02-28
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFood Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-9192 • E-ISSN: 1873-5657
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.01.011
OpenAlexW2747275763
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited18

This paper contributes to the literature on the trade liberalization – climate change nexus by investigating the impact of the current free trade agenda of the European Union (EU) on the effectiveness of a possible greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction policy for its agricultural sector. For the analysis we implement scenarios with a carbon tax on non-CO2 emissions and trade liberalization both individually and combined in CAPRI, a global partial equilibrium model for agriculture. Scenario results indicate that the simulated trade liberalization by itself has only modest effects on agricultural GHG emissions by 2030. Pricing agricultural non-CO2 emissions in the EU triggers the adoption of mitigation technologies, which contributes to emission reductions. Emission leakage, however, partially offsets the EU emission\nsavings as production increases in less emission-efficient regions in the world. The combination of agricultural trade liberalization and carbon pricing increases emission leakage and, therefore, further undermines global mitigation gains. Our results hinge on the key assumptions that future trade agreements between non-EU countries are not considered and that the climate actions are limited to the EU only. Despite these limitations we conclude that, from a global GHG mitigation perspective, trade agreements should address emission leakage, for instance by being conditional on participating nations adopting measures directed towards GHG mitigation

Agriculture · Carbon leakage · Economics · Emissions trading · European union · Free trade · Greenhouse gas · International economics · International trade · Liberalization · Market economy · Natural resource economics · Nexus (standard · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Environmental Impact and Sustainability

  • Double-edged sword

    Open Access•Yanyong Hu, Zhixiao Zou et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • EU agriculture under an import stop for food and feed

    Open Access•Ferike Thom, Alexander Gocht et al.•World Economy•2024

  • Carbon border adjustments or climate clubs

    Open Access•Andrea M Bassi, Francesco Calciolari et al.•World Economy•2025

  • Impacts of national vs European carbon pricing on agriculture

    Open Access•Davit Stepanyan, Claudia Heidecke et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2023

  • Impacts of supply-side climate change mitigation practices and trade policy regimes under dietary transition

    Open Access•Francesco Clora, Wusheng Yu et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • How much multilateralism do we need? Effectiveness of unilateral agricultural mitigation efforts in the global context

    Open Access•Stefan Frank, Peter Havlík et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Pollution Haven Hypothesis of Global CO2, SO2, NOx—Evidence from 43 Economies and 56 Sectors

    Open Access•Ke Zhang, Xingwei Wang•International Journal of…•2021

  • The role of forest and agriculture towards environmental fortification

    Open Access•Kashif Raza Abbasi, Festus Fatai Adedoyin et al.•Environment Development and…•2022

  • Impact of government expenditures, foreign direct investment, trade openness, and energy consumption on ecological footprints in selected Asian economies

    Open Access•Samreen Gillani, Hafiz Syed Mohsin Abbas•Environment Development and…•2023

  • Agricultural trade liberalization and domestic fertilizer use

    Open Access•Fei Nie, Jian Li et al.•Ecological Economics•2022

  • China’s Agricultural Green Transition and High-Quality Development Toward Carbon Neutrality

    Open Access•Shuo Wang, Lingran Yuan et al.•Chinese Political Science Review•2023

  • Projections of soil loss by water erosion in Europe by 2050

    Open Access•Panos Panagos, Cristiano Ballabio et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2021

  • The impacts of agricultural development and trade on CO2 emissions? Evidence from the Non-European Union countries

    Open Access•Jeremiás Máté Balogh•Environmental Science & Policy•2022

  • How does agricultural global value chain affect ecological footprint? The moderating role of environmental regulation

    Open Access•Yubing Xu, Cuixia Li et al.•Sustainable Development•2023

  • A framework for promoting natural climate solutions in the agriculture sector

    Open Access•Lisa Ashton•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Agricultural trade shocks and carbon leakage

    Open Access•Jiangfeng Hu, Zhao Wang et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2021

  • Can investments in manure technology reduce nutrient leakage to the Baltic Sea

    Open Access•Torbjörn Jansson, Hans Estrup Andersen et al.•AMBIO•2019

  • Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008

    Open Access•Glen P Peters, Jan C Minx et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2011

  • Trade, Growth, and the Environment

    Brian R Copeland, M Scott Taylor•Journal of Economic Literature•2004

  • A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production (Une theorie de la demande de produits differencies d'apres leur origine) (Una teoria de la demanda de productos distinguiendolos segun el lugar de produccion)

    Paul S Armington•Staff Papers•1969

  • CO 2 Embodied in International Trade with Implications for Global Climate Policy

    Glen P Peters, Edgar G Hertwich•Environmental Science & Technology•2008

  • Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement

    Gene M Grossman, Gene Grossman et al.•National Bureau of Economic…•1991

  • CH 4 and N 2 O emissions embodied in international trade of meat

    Open Access•Dario Caro, Anna LoPresti et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2014

  • Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — Part 2

    Open Access•Thomas Wiedmann, Manfred Lenzen et al.•Ecological Economics•2007

  • An integration of net imported emissions into climate change targets

    Open Access•Kate Scott, John Barrett•Environmental Science & Policy•2015

  • Understanding the contribution of non-carbon dioxide gases in deep mitigation scenarios

    Open Access•David Gernaat, Katherine Calvin et al.•Global Environmental Change•2015

  • Climate change and trade in agriculture

    Open Access•Hsin Huang, Martin von Lampe et al.•Food Policy•2011

Citations per year2.43
Citation span2019 - 2025 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae