Defamation, gender and hierarchy in late medieval Yorkshire

This article focuses on a late fourteenth-century defamation suit from the ecclesiastical court of York to demonstrate the granular nature of gender identity and homosocial cooperation and competition across status groups. In this case, a dispute between two gentry families developed into an accusation of sexual dishonour against the father of an unmarried pregnant woman. The analysis of networks of homosocial interaction reveals the gendered composition of reputation and identity at the social level. Male anxiety solidified around honesty in sexual and personal dealings, while concerns about social and religious status arose as the scandal became widely publicised. The study qualifies works on masculinity and insult in late-medieval society, demonstrating the significance of sexual honour and speech in men’s disputes over reputation. It also illustrates the extent to which patriarchal authority could be enforced through control over the sexual activity of dependent men. Despite the involvement of gentry and lower aristocratic parties, the perspectives of women and non-elite men are visible and reveal the limits of patriarchal control in gentry households. Thus, the article delineates the nature of disputes between elite and lower-status men, tracing the boundaries of reputations, as well as their protection and maintenance in periods of conflict

Criminology · Elite · False accusation · Gentry · Honour · Identity (music · Masculinity · Nobility · Political science · Politics · Reputation · Social status · Sociology · Gender Studies · Law · Marriage and Sexual Relationships · Medieval Literature and History · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

• The Trans Middle Ages

  Open Access•Tess Wingard•The English Historical Review•2023

  Add to list

• Frying Pans, Limpets, Donkeys and Becs-jaunes

  Open Access•Hannah Skoda•Global Intellectual History•2023

  Add to list