An Asymmetric Relationship

The Spirit of Kenneth Craik and the Work of Warren McCulloch

Bibliographic Data

ID11935622
AuthorsAlan F Collins (0000-0002-7229-4349, Lancaster University, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume37
Issue3
Pages254-268
Publication date2012-09-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInterdisciplinary Science Reviews (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-0188 • E-ISSN: 1743-2790
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1179/0308018812z.00000000020
OpenAlexW2028482501
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited36

Warren McCulloch held Kenneth Craik’s work in high regard. What was the source of this high regard and did this good opinion mean that Craik’s work had any effect on McCulloch’s own work? Aspects of Craik and McCulloch’s backgrounds are examined to help explain McCulloch’s views: the important place of philosophy in their education and some shared philosophical positions, their attraction to work in diverse disciplines, a respect for the science of physiology, an acceptance that mind was a legitimate object of enquiry, the demands and opportunities of military and wartime research, and a shared sense of creating a new approach to inquiries into human abilities. Two aspects of Craik’s theory about the nature of thought were also key: his claim that modelling was central to thought and the fact that those views complemented McCulloch’s own. Finally, McCulloch helped to contribute to Craik’s reputation and in doing so helped to create a founding father for cybernetics to be set alongside the likes of Ashby, Wiener and McCulloch himself

Cognitive science · Cybernetics · Epistemology · Key (lock · Object (grammar · Reputation · Set (abstract data type · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Cybernetics and Technology in Society · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy, Science, and History · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub