How many cultures? ‘Real presences’ and the healing of the academy

In this paper we re-examine the relationship and possibilities for discourse between the academic disciplines called ‘sciences’ and those known as ‘arts’. Do they represent one culture or two? An apparent diversity of views emerges in two contemporary writers, George Steiner and Nicholas Lash, the former differentiating the two, the latter insisting that the ‘two cultures’ debate itself is misconstrued. We follow the principal threads of both arguments in the light of an intimate involvement with the practice of science and its communication in public and academic contexts. Visiting aspects of both arts and sciences that distinguish them from other disciplines, the role of theory, and the twin purposes of function and contemplation, we find that much of the pain of discourse between them arises from a failure to recognise common structures and functions. As a result, either function or contemplation may be overemphasised at the expense of the other. We suggest directions in which the tensions might be resolved in both public and academic arenas

Aesthetics · Art · Art history · Cognitive science · Contemplation · Diversity (politics · Epistemology · Form and function · Function (biology · George (robot · Principal (computer security · Sociology · The arts · Visual arts · Anthropology · Artistic and Creative Research · Arts, Culture, and Music Studies · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · History · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

• The Two Cultures

  Open Access•C P Snow, Stefan Collini•Two Cultures•1993

  Add to list