Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Standards of Proof in Law and Science

Bibliographic Data

ID11937092
AuthorsLee Loevinger (corresponding author)
Year1993
Volume18
Issue2
Pages144-152
Publication date1993-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInterdisciplinary Science Reviews (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-0188 • E-ISSN: 1743-2790
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1179/030801893789766924
OpenAlexW4248367679
LanguageEN

Ascertainment of facts is basic to both science and law and it rests upon proof. In this context, proof is a quantum and quality of evidence or data sufficient to support a conclusion. But criteria for determining what degree of evidence/data is adequate have taken centuries to develop and are still elusive. Science uses quantitative criteria subject to statistical analysis. Law uses verbally described categorical criteria. Analytically, both processes rest upon subjective judgements or assumptions. Science, because of the nature of the questions it addresses, has an empirical or pragmatic mode of validation that other disciplines lack, but ultimately proof of facts in all disciplines rests upon judgements of probability

Categorical variable · Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Political science · Quality (philosophy · Rest (music · Statistics · Subject (documents · Computer Science · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae