Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cultures of Incomprehension

The Legacy of the Two Cultures Debate at the End of the Twentieth Century

Bibliographic Data

ID11937610
AuthorsSimon J Lock (0000-0003-2645-8549, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume41
Issue2-3
Pages148-166
Publication date2016-07-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInterdisciplinary Science Reviews (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-0188 • E-ISSN: 1743-2790
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03080188.2016.1223581
OpenAlexW2558796050
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited20

This paper considers the impact of Snow's Two Culture's thesis on debates about the place of science and scientists in society in the latter part of the twentieth century. Debates concerned with the public understanding of science and the ‘science wars’, both of which relied to some extent on the dividing of society into ‘two cultures’, are contextualised within longer efforts by scientists to popularise definitions of science and society and their relationship with other epistemic communities. This paper argues that we should think about all these episodes as part of ongoing rhetorical boundary work, reflective of strains and stressors on science as an institution. The two cultures debate has provided one powerful rhetorical device, amongst many, for ongoing boundary work to establish or question science as the dominant form of knowledge in society and delineate who is allowed to speak for it, and wield its power

Boundary-work · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Institution · Political science · Power (physics · Rhetorical question · Science studies · Social science · Sociology · Work (physics · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Philosophy · Rhetoric and Communication Studies

  • United Kingdom

    Melanie Smallman, Simon J Lock et al.•Communicating Science•2020

  • The three cultures in American science

    Open Access•G Yair, Keith Goldstein et al.•Scientometrics•2022

  • Governance, expertise, and the ‘culture of care’

    Open Access•Robert G W Kirk, Dmitriy Myelnikov•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2022

  • Higher superstition

    Paul R Gross•Higher superstition•1994

  • Public Understanding of Science

    Brian Wynne•Handbook of Science and…•1995

  • Handbook of Science and Technology Studies

    Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E Markle et al.•Handbook of Science and…•1995

  • How to think about the `anti-science' phenomenon

    Open Access•Gerald Holton•Public Understanding of Science•1992

  • After the “Two Cultures”

    Open Access•José Van Dijck•Science Communication•2003

  • The Unnatural Nature of Science

    Open Access•Lewis Wolpert•European Review•2013

  • Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science

    Thomas F Gieryn•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Policing STS

    Open Access•Tom Gieryn•Science Technology & Human Values•1996

  • Public Understanding of Science

    Open Access•John Ziman•Science Technology & Human Values•1991

  • John Tyndall, Pantheist

    Robert Barton, Ruth Barton•Osiris•1987

  • The Construction of the Paranormal

    Open Access•H M Collins, Harry Collins et al.•The Sociological Review•1979

  • My Enemy's Enemy Is, Only Perhaps, My Friend

    Hilary Rose•Social Text•1996

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2020 - 2022 (3)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae