Artificial agency and the game of semantic extension

Bibliographic Data

ID11937833
AuthorsFabio Fossa (0000-0003-3379-9114, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico of Milan, Milan, Italy, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume46
Issue4
Pages440-457
Publication date2021-10-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInterdisciplinary Science Reviews (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-0188 • E-ISSN: 1743-2790
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03080188.2020.1868684
OpenAlexW3206763166
LanguageEN
References cited26

Artificial agents are commonly described by using words that traditionally belong to the semantic field of life. I call this phenomenon the game of semantic extension. However, the semantic extension of words as crucial as ‘autonomous’, ‘intelligent’, ‘creative’, ‘moral’, and so on, is often perceived as unsatisfactory, which is signalled with the extensive use of inverted commas or other syntactical cues. Such practice, in turn, has provoked harsh criticism that usually refers back to the literal meaning of the words to show their inappropriateness in describing artificial agents. Hence the question: how can we choose our words appropriately and wisely while making sense of artificial agents? This paper tries to answer by sketching the main features of the game of semantic extension in relation to artificial agency, reviewing the related opportunities and risks, and advancing some practical suggestions on how to play the game well

Agency (philosophy · Epistemology · Extension (predicate logic · Field (mathematics · Meaning (existential · Natural language processing · Phenomenon · Relation (database · Semantic relation · Computer Science · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access