Intensive Fostering

An Independent Evaluation of MTFC in an English Setting

Bibliographic Data

ID11942696
AuthorsNina Biehal (0000-0002-1341-2544, Children and Young People's Social Work Team, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, UK, corresponding author), Sarah Ellison (0000-0003-0354-265X, Children and Young People's Social Work Team, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, UK), I Sinclair (0000-0003-2052-4234, University of York)
Year2012
Volume36
Issue1
Pages13-26
Publication date2012-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAdoption & Fostering (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-5759 • E-ISSN: 1740-469X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/030857591203600104
OpenAlexW2033709900
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited21

Nina Biehal, Sarah Ellison and Ian Sinclair present the results of an independent evaluation of the Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care (MTFC) programme for young offenders in England, where it is known as Intensive Fostering (IF). A quasi-experimental, mixed-methods study was carried out at the three pilot sites, with a total sample of 47 at follow-up. Young people sentenced to IF were compared to a similar group, matched on the eligibility criteria for IF, the majority of whom were sentenced to custody. The groups were well matched in terms of their characteristics and criminal histories. Official data on reconviction were collected at baseline and one year after entry to the IF placement or release from custody (Stage 1), and further data on programme completion and secondary outcomes were collected via interviews with young people and parents, and questionnaires to professionals at baseline and follow-up. Official data on reconviction were also collected one year after exit from the IF placements (Stage 2). At Stage 1 the IF group were less likely to be reconvicted, had committed fewer and less-serious recorded offences, on average, and took longer to commit their first recorded offence. At this point the IF group were more likely to be living with their families and less likely to be in custody than the comparison group. However, by Stage 2 no significant differences in patterns of reconviction remained. IF successfully contained a high-risk group in the community, but the effects of the intervention diminished once they left their foster placements. Environmental effects on entry to and exit from the IF placements may help to explain the results at both stages

Commit · Intervention (counseling · Psychiatry · Sociology · Child Abuse and Trauma · Child Welfare and Adoption · Demography · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Medicine · Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub