Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Colonial and Provincial Separation Movements in Australia and New Zealand, 1856–1865

Bibliographic Data

ID11944404
AuthorsAndré Brett (0000-0001-9476-6549, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume47
Issue1
Pages51-75
Publication date2018-08-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-6534 • E-ISSN: 1743-9329
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03086534.2018.1506864
OpenAlexW2887582759
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited13

This article examines separation movements in Britain’s Australasian colonies during the first decade of responsible government, 1856–65. Separation movements sought to carve new colonies from the territory of existing ones or, in the case of a number of New Zealand movements, to create new provinces within that colony’s quasi-federal system. Their demands rested upon assertions that a colonial or provincial government neglected large and prosperous hinterlands from which considerable revenue was collected. Only one colonial separation movement achieved its goal, but four provinces succeeded. I argue that responsible government played a major role in the success or failure of these movements. Responsibility concentrated authority in a remote capital; colonial separatists desired to exercise this privilege within a smaller new colony that they controlled, but its operation within the larger existing colony provided London with justification to reject most appeals. Further, it allowed New Zealand’s parliament to frame a mechanism that enabled discontented regions to become provinces without referral to local or imperial legislatures. Thus, I provide new insights into the formation of colonial polities and the influence of responsible government on settler political campaigns

Colonialism · Commonwealth · Economics · Government (linguistics · Legislative assembly · Legislature · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Privilege (computing · Revenue · Sociology · Australian History and Society · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Law · Scottish History and National Identity

  • The capitalist state and critical agrarian studies

    Open Access•Anna Sturman•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2025

  • The ‘Tangled Web’ of Separation

    Open Access•G P SHAW, Gail Shaw•Australian Journal of Politics &…•1983

  • Clarence river separatism in 1860 a problem of communications

    C D Rowley•Historical Studies Australia and…•1941

  • Moreton bay separation

    B A Knox, Bruce Knox•Historical Studies•1971

  • The Oxford History of Australia, Vol. 3, 1860-1900, Glad, Confident Morning

    Open Access•John Hirst, Beverley Kingston•Labour History•1989

  • Dreaming on a Railway Track

    Open Access•André Brett•The Journal of Transport History•2015

  • Colonial Self-Government

    Open Access•John M Ward•Colonial Self-Government•1976

  • The Cambridge History of the British Empire

    J Holland Rose, A P Newton et al.•Geographical Journal•1934

  • The Riverina 1861-1891

    E M Bridges, G L Buxton•Geographical Journal•1968

  • Colonial Ambition

    Open Access•Robert Darby, Peter Cochrane•Labour History•2008

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae