Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Constructing British Authority in Australasia

Charles Cooper and the Legal Status of Aborigines in the South Australian Supreme Court, c. 1840–60

Bibliographic Data

ID11944565
AuthorsDamen Ward (Crown College, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume34
Issue4
Pages483-504
Publication date2006-11-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-6534 • E-ISSN: 1743-9329
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03086530600991407
OpenAlexW2030417643
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited13

In 1840 the South Australian judge Charles Cooper wrote an opinion in which he suggested that Aborigines who had not been in contact with British settlers were not within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. The resulting controversy led the Colonial Office to clarify its view on the subjecthood of Aborigines within the colony and the colonial courts' jurisdiction over all subjects in the colony. The criminal jurisdiction of the Supreme Court over Aborigines became politically important because it raised wider questions of imperial authority and colonial policy. By placing Cooper's views in a broader Australasian perspective, the formation of Colonial Office policy and the distinctions between legal categories that informed that policy may be better appreciated. Cooper continued to question the general application of Supreme Court jurisdiction to Aborigines into the late 1840s. This caused a clash with Lieutenant-Governor Robe, who felt that any weakness in the formal authority or jurisdiction of the courts threatened the ability of the government to implement effective policies

Colonialism · Federal jurisdiction · Jurisdiction · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Sociology · Supreme court · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Australian History and Society · History · Law · Law in Society and Culture

  • Impersonating a Voter

    Naomi Parkinson, Naomi Gabrielle Parkinson•The Journal of Imperial &…•2019

  • The 1898 Dog Tax War as an Incursion on Māori De Recto Sovereignty

    Open Access•P Moon•The Journal of Imperial &…•2026

  • Jus Soli and Jus Sanguinis in the Colonies

    Open Access•C J Lee•Law and History Review•2011

  • Imperial Meridian

    C A Bayly•Imperial Meridian•2016

  • Histories, Power and Loss

    W H Oliver, Paul G McHugh et al.•Histories, power and loss•2001

  • Law and Colonial Cultures

    Open Access•Lauren A Benton, Lauren Benton•Law and Colonial Cultures•2001

  • The Law of the Land or the Law of the Land

    Open Access•Bain Attwood•History Compass•2004

  • Settling Some Very Important Principles of Colonial Law

    Open Access•Mark Hickford•Victoria University of Wellington…•2004

  • Aunt Anna's Report’

    Zoë Laidlaw•The Journal of Imperial &…•2004

  • An Australian “Historikerstreit” ? Review Article

    Open Access•Andrew G Bonnell, Martin Crotty•Australian Journal of Politics &…•2004

  • The legend of James Brown

    Robert Foster•Australian Historical Studies•1998

  • British policy towards the Australian aborigines, 1830–1850

    A G L Shaw•Australian Historical Studies•1992

  • A Means and Measure of Civilisation

    Open Access•Damen Ward•History Compass•2003

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,2
Citation span2011 - 2026 (16)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae