Blindness which we mistake for sight’
British officials and the economic world of the cultivator in colonial Burma
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11944585 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ian Brown (0000-0003-0539-9367, SOAS University of London, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 181-193 |
| Publication date | 2005-05-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-6534 • E-ISSN: 1743-9329 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03086530500123788 |
| OpenAlex | W2138072976 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Prompted by the recent completion of a study of the economic – and, to a degree, social and political – strategies used by Burma's rice cultivator to mitigate the potentially devastating impact of the economic crisis of the early 1930s on his material circumstances, this article explores some of the major methodological issues faced by the historian seeking an understanding of the economic behaviour of the cultivator in Burma under colonial rule. One set of issues concerns the need to locate that economic behaviour in a distinctive cultural context. A second rises from the fact that since almost the sole source for the Burma research is the surviving records of the colonial administration, the historian is forced to peer into the economic world of the Burmese rice cultivator through the eyes of British officials, whose sight of that world was far from complete and commonly distorted by cultural preconceptions. Here the article pays attention to the historian's use of colonial statistical data and impressionistic reports
Archaeology · Blindness · Burmese · Colonial rule · Colonialism · Context (archaeology · Mistake · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sight · Sociology · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Cambodian History and Society · History · Law
| Citations per year | 0.13 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2011 - 2013 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |