Communicative and Agonistic Planning Theories in the Face of Populist Rhetoric
Reflections on Minneapolis 2040 Process
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11947191 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hanna Mattila (0000-0002-1911-7618, corresponding author), Aino Hirvola (0000-0001-8656-1869), Tom Borrup |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1523-1540 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-17 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0309-1317 • E-ISSN: 1468-2427 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-2427.13351 |
| OpenAlex | W4410184055 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 50 |
This article discusses populist rhetoric in the context of participatory urban planning. Populist rhetoric builds on emotionally charged expression and juxtapositions between ‘the people’ and ‘the elite’ including planners. In so doing, it poses a challenge to planners who have learned to follow the ideals of communicative planning, highlighting public, rational problem‐solving and orientation toward agreement. Recently, the agonistic theory of planning has put into question these ideals, advancing a view that disagreements, passion‐driven resistance and populist rhetoric can advance democratic political culture, and by extension, planning culture. If populism can advance democracy in planning, should planners then reject the idea of countering populism with consensus‐oriented communicative strategies and turn to agonistically oriented theory instead? What are the pros and cons of each theory in the face of populism? How do they help planners in identifying when populism serves democracy and when it works for anti‐democratic goals? The article examines these questions, illustrating the discussion with reflections on populist public feedback and planners’ response to this feedback in the Minneapolis 2040 comprehensive planning process
Aesthetics · Aggression · Agonistic behaviour · Art · Face (sociological concept · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Populism · Process (computing · Rhetoric · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Psychology
Collaborative Planning
Evidence-Based Planning
It’s Time to End Single-Family Zoning
Moral consciousness and communicative action
Communication and the Evolution of Society
The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory
Habermas revisited
Nimbyism and Legitimate Expectations
Upzoning and Single-Family Housing Prices
Making Better Places
Recapturing Democracy
The Public and Its Problems
Counter-Democracy
The Politics of Resentment
Racial Disparities, Homeownership, and Mortgage Lending in the Post-Great Recession Period
Rise Like Lions After Slumber’
Strife
Can collaborative planning go beyond locally focused notions of the “public interest”? The potential of Habermas’ concept of “generalizable interest” in pluralist and trans-scalar planning discourses
Populists and planners
Hollowed out Heartland, USA
Just Planning
Pragmatism, Planning, and Power
Pragmatist democracy and the populist challenge
Sustainability as Empty Signifier
The politics of sustainable development opposition
The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind
Post‐political spatial planning in England
The Pragmatic Tradition in Planning Thought
Agon'izing Over Consensus
Doing Good and Being Right The Pragmatic Connection in Planning Theory
What Is Populism
Right-wing populism and urban planning
Populism or pragmatism? Two ways of understanding political articulation
Resisting Neoliberalization
Planning through debate
Bringing Back the Mines and a Way of Life
Spatializing Populism
Between Facts and Norms
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |