Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Marx’s ‘costs of consumption’

A new framework for analysing the economic character of ‘reproductive labour’

Bibliographic Data

ID11951186
AuthorsChenxi Gao (0000-0003-3617-5876, Kyushu Sangyo University, corresponding author), Mingze Bai (0000-0002-0112-2750, University of Hong Kong)
Year2026
Publication date2026-01-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCapital & Class (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0309-8168 • E-ISSN: 2041-0980
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/03098168261415847
OpenAlexW7126457151
LanguageEN
References cited18

This study resurrects Marx’s concept of ‘costs of consumption’ to resolve persistent theoretical impasses in the domestic labour debate. We argue that attempts to analyse ‘reproductive labour’ through production categories stem from a fundamental methodological mismatch. By systematically reconstructing Marx’s distinction between productive and individual consumption, we demonstrate that ‘reproductive labour’ corresponds to Marx’s ‘labour indispensable for family consumption’, operating within costs of consumption in individual consumption. This labour – whether performed as unpaid ‘expenditure of labour in the house’ or as marketised services requiring ‘increased expenditure of money’ – maintains its character as unproductive labour fulfilling essential ‘family functions’. The two forms of costs of consumption – labour expenditure by domestic labour and monetary expenditure through services – offer theoretical grounds for explaining the dynamic relationship between production and reproduction in social reproduction theory; a genuinely Marxian analysis of ‘reproductive labour’ requires a fundamental theoretical reorientation from production to consumption as the appropriate analytical lens

Character (mathematics · Consumption (sociology · Production (economics · Reproduction · Social reproduction · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Political Economy and Marxism · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • Appendix

    Lise Vogel•Marxism and the Oppression of Women•2013

  • Care, Gender, and Justice

    Diemut Bubeck, Diemut Elisabet Bubeck•Care, gender, and justice•1995

  • Social Reproduction Theory

    Tithi Bhattacharya•Social Reproduction Theory•2017

  • How Not to Skip Class

    Tithi Bhattacharya•Social Reproduction Theory•2017

  • The Role of Household Production in the Determination of Wages and the Process of Capitalist Production

    Open Access•Paddy Quick•Review of Radical Political…•2020

  • Capitalism, Patriarchy, and Job Segregation by Sex

    Heidi Hartmann•Signs: Journal of Women in…•1976

  • Crisis of Care? On the Social-Reproductive Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism

    Nancy Fraser•Social Reproduction Theory•2017

  • Labor Power

    Paddy Quick•Science & Society•2018

  • Social Reproduction Theory,” Social Reproduction, and Household Production

    Kirstin Munro•Science & Society•2019

  • Beyond the Domestic Labour Debate

    Maxine Molyneux•New left review•1979

  • Women’s Domestic Labour

    Jean Gardiner•New left review•1975

  • The Housewife and Her Labour Under Capitalism

    Wally Seccombe•New left review•1974

  • The Political Economy of Women's Liberation

    Open Access•Margaret Lowe Benston, Margaret Benston•Monthly Review•2019

  • The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism

    Open Access•Heidi I Hartmann, Heidi Hartmann•Capital & Class•1979

  • An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations

    Adam Smith, Edwin Cannan et al.•An inquiry into the nature and…•1977

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae