Disability, Dependency and Indebtedness
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11952001 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Vorhaus (0000-0002-0644-8071, University of London, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 29-44 |
| Publication date | 2007-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Philosophy of Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0309-8249 • E-ISSN: 1467-9752 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2007.00537.x |
| OpenAlex | W2163096843 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 9 |
What does dependency reveal about human learning? All humans are dependent, largely because we are variously vulnerable and disabled at more than one stage in our lives. In this paper the subject of dependency is approached largely in the context of our vulnerable and disabled states, including in particular, states of profound disability. The primary contention is that our dependent states should feature in accounts of how we learn, and of relations between learner and teacher, in ways that compare with the attention given to personal autonomy and independence
Autonomy · Cognitive psychology · Context (archaeology · Dependency (UML · Developmental psychology · Feature (linguistics · Independence (probability theory · Learning disability · Linguistics · Personal autonomy · Political science · Subject (documents · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Psychology
Sharing in a Common Life
Capability, freedom and profound disability
Rights discourses in relation to education of people with intellectual disability
Philosophy and profound disability
Notes From The Exclusion Zone
Four Paradigm Cases of Dependency in Care Relations
Feminist Approaches to Cognitive Disability
| Citations per year | 0.44 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2010 - 2021 (12) |
| Highly cited | No |