Education(al) Research, Educational Policy-Making and Practice
Education(al) Research, Educational Policy-Making and Practice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11952035 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Charles M A Clark (More Associates, corresponding author), Charles Clark (0000-0002-0327-1223) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 37-57 |
| Publication date | 2010-11-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Philosophy of Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0309-8249 • E-ISSN: 1467-9752 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2010.00769.x |
| OpenAlex | W1916531317 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 40 |
Professor Whitty has endorsed the consensus that research into education is empirical social science, distinguishing ‘educational research’ which seeks directly to influence practice, and ‘education research’ that has substantive value but no necessary practical application. The status of the science here is problematic. The positivist approach is incoherent and so supports neither option. Critical educational science is virtually policy-inert. The interpretive approach is empirically sound but, because of the value component in education, does not support education research either, or account for this component. A solution to the latter problem is sought in the debate between Carr and Hirst on the relationship between philosophy and education. This shows Carr making claims that rely on a conception of philosophy that he rejects, while Hirst insists on this conception, uses it to justify practical claims, but denies that this is possible. To achieve a practically relevant analysis of educational research, both need to include second-order, normative, conceptual enquiry into the philosophies that drive educational policy-making and partly regulate teaching methodology. Deweyan, first-order, ‘reflective practice’ needs, then, to be supplemented with second-order reflection. Educational research is philosophy- not science-driven, and is value-led. Consequently, it has the status not of scientific discovery but of practical recommendation
Argument (complex analysis · Carr · Education theory · Educational research · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Higher education · Normative · Order (exchange · Pedagogy · Philosophy of education · Philosophy of science · Political science · Positivism · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Law · Philosophy · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education · Religious Education and Schools
Understanding other persons
Educational Theory and Its Foundation Disciplines (RLE Edu K)
Educational Research, Policymaking and Practice
Human Agency and Language
The Philosophy of Philosophy
The Structure of Science
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person
The reflective practitioner
After Virtue
A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind
The Explanation of Behaviour
Aristotle
Philosophy and the Human Sciences
Fourth-Generation Evaluation
Educational Research as a Form of Democratic Rationality
Educational Research and Policy
The 'False Dualism' of Educational Research
The Importance of Being Thorough
As if by Machinery
Carr and Kemmis's Reflections
On the Epistemological Basis of Large-Scale Population Studies and their Educational Use
Philosophy And Education-A Symposium
Philosophy and Education
Why Teachers Need Philosophy
Philosophy's Contribution to Social Science Research on Education
Pluralism, Indeterminacy and the Social Sciences
The structure of educational research
The Subject‐matter of Educational Research
Education(al) research and education policy making
In praise of educational research’
The Philosophy of The Social Sciences
Social Theory and Political Practice
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,4 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2023 (13) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |