Self‐Esteem And The Confidence To Fail
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11953162 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ruth Cigman (Department of Humanities, Mary Ward Centre, 42 Queen Square, London, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 561-576 |
| Publication date | 2001-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Philosophy of Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0309-8249 • E-ISSN: 1467-9752 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9752.00245 |
| OpenAlex | W2129131645 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
This paper takes a sideways look at the controversial topic of educational assessment, raising the question: what place should the success/failure distinction have in an effective and humane educational system? Though the experience of failure may undermine the self-esteem that is conducive to learning, its possibility is clearly important educationally. Instead of asking whether teachers should be truthful about children’s achievements or dishonestly promote their self-esteem, we need to recognise a certain logical indeterminacy about what young children can do. Given this, it is reasonable to presume in favour of many of their capacities rather than against them, for this is how children develop the confidence to act. This includes the confidence to fail as well as the confidence to succeed. It is argued that both are crucial for learning
Epistemology · Higher education · Indeterminacy (philosophy · Philosophy of education · Political science · Raising (metalworking · Self-confidence · Self-esteem · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational and Psychological Assessments · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,42 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2023 (17) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |