Will my boomerang come back? New insights into Aboriginal material culture of early Sydney and affiliated coastal zone from British collections
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11955955 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gaye Sculthorpe (0000-0002-0881-8961, Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia, corresponding author), Daniel Simpson (0000-0003-4819-2868, Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 149-171 |
| Publication date | 2023-05-04 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Archaeology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0312-2417 • E-ISSN: 2470-0363 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03122417.2023.2214336 |
| OpenAlex | W4380997625 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 24 |
Aboriginal material culture of the Sydney region has been analysed extensively by Australian archaeologists, notably Vincent Megaw and Val Attenbrow, yet many new insights can be obtained through the examination of hitherto unidentified and unexamined museum objects and dispersed archival documentation in Britain and Ireland. Close engagement with these sources permits a more informed explication of the variety of objects in use in colonial Sydney and its greater affiliated coastal zone. Focussing on the period 1788–1870, this article examines three related object types, termed variously in English ‘swords’, ‘boomerangs’ and ‘clubs’, to investigate their nature, current and former distribution, and histories of collection. Discussions with members of the La Perouse Aboriginal Community in Sydney indicate a great interest in collaborative research to improve understanding of such objects, because few of these collected and removed objects have been documented to a precise place of origin. Stylistic comparison of actual objects with historic images of similar types therefore remains a basic first step. This fundamental work is necessary to engage the appropriate community research partners but raises questions as to methodologies for community engagement with unprovenanced objects, or those known only to be from a large regional area, which may encompass many groups. Ascertaining places of origin is thus critical to ensuring the accuracy and validity of any repatriation or restitution efforts, and in making sure that the ‘right’ objects return to relevant Aboriginal communities
Archaeology · Art · Colonialism · Documentation · Explication · Media studies · Object (grammar · Political science · Project commissioning · Publishing · Repatriation · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics · Visual arts · Archaeological Research and Protection · Computer Science · Conservation Techniques and Studies · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies · History · Law
Something old, something new
A Narrative of the Expedition to Botany Bay
‘There’s A Hole In My Shield…’A Textual Footnote
A young slip of botany’
A Case of Identity
Hidden in Plain View
A Shield Loaded with History
Ancestors, Artefacts, Empire
The Royal Navy in Indigenous Australia, 1795–1855
Un contenant en algue de Tasmanie de l’expédition d’Entrecasteaux (1791-94) identifié au musée du quai Branly – Jacques Chirac
Remnants of the ‘Wallis Maro ‘Ura ’ (Tahitian Feathered Girdle)
Aboriginal spears of Port Jackson type discovered—a bicentennial sequel
What's in a name
A Tongan Tapua in the Pitt Rivers Museum
An Aboriginal shield collected in 1770 at Kamay Botany Bay
Cook Voyage Provenance of the 'Artificial Curiosities' of Bullock's Museum
Australian Throwing-sticks, Throwing-clubs, and Boomerangs1
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |