More Unconsidered Trifles? Aboriginal and Archaeological Heritage Values
Integration and Disjuncture in Cultural Heritage Management Practice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11956185 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sharon Sullivan (Sullivan Blazejowski and Associates, 580 Boundary Creek Road, Nymboida, NSW 2460, Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 107-115 |
| Publication date | 2008-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Archaeology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0312-2417 • E-ISSN: 2470-0363 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03122417.2008.11681883 |
| OpenAlex | W1602087923 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 6 |
In the early 1980s, Sandra Bowdler established a firm foundation for the assessment of archaeological significance and urged the integration of archaeological and Aboriginal values in site assessment, listing and management. This paper describes developments in the integration of archaeological and Aboriginal heritage values, using recent work by Lilley and Williams as an example. The paper then goes on to question whether this progress is reflected in the relatively newly introduced National Heritage listing process (which replaced the Register of the National Estate), taking the listing of rock art on the Dampier Archipelago in Western Australia as a case study.The paper analyses the values for which the Dampier Archipelago was listed, and the implications of this listing. It concludes that in this case, in large part because of the workings of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, archaeological and Aboriginal values have become separated. It concludes that some of the listing processes seem to be inimical to the melding of these values, now so much a part of Australian and, increasingly, international best practice in cultural heritage management. It also suggests that the method of assessing archaeological values for the National Heritage List and the future impacts on these values does not properly consider the site as an archaeological landscape, and could potentially allow its gradual diminution
Archaeology · Archipelago · Business · Cultural heritage · Cultural heritage management · Estate · Geography · Listing (finance · Political science · Project commissioning · Publishing · Sociology · Work (physics · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Conservation Techniques and Studies · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Engineering · History · Law
Transcending the Culture-Nature Divide in Cultural Heritage
Challenging Narratives
Aboriginal Epistemologies and Interpretations of Art and Place on the Blue Tier Northeast Tasmania
Mining contestation as an impetus for natural and cultural heritage protection
Managing a contested cultural heritage place on K’gari (Fraser Island), Queensland, Australia
Power relations and community involvement in landscape-based cultural heritage management practice
Peopling Places, Storying Spaces
Mapping an archaeology of the present
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2025 (16) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |