Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Future of Adult Guardianship in Federal Australia

Bibliographic Data

ID11958321
AuthorsJohn Chesterman (0000-0001-6827-0275, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume66
Issue1
Pages26-38
Publication date2012-11-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Social Work (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0312-407X • E-ISSN: 1447-0748
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0312407x.2012.715657
OpenAlexW2030869168
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited5

This article explores two key societal developments that in different, yet related, ways are encouraging national policy changes to Australia's state- and territory-based adult guardianship arrangements. The first concerns the changing demographic nature and disability profile of those Australians who are subject to guardianship orders, with older Australians increasingly—through age-related disabilities—being eligible for guardianship orders. The second concerns the supremacy of the rights paradigm under which guardianship and all other forms of state regulation are increasingly operating, which itself creates opportunities for, and expectations of, national-level policy making and leadership. The article examines recent academic literature as well as literature generated by recent government inquiries, and argues that while the states and territories should continue to regulate the provision of guardianship, certain national policy developments are warranted. These include clearer guidance about the need for substitute decision making when people become residents of aged-care facilities, and the development of national guardianship principles

Government (linguistics · Guardian · Legal guardian · Political science · State (computer science · Elder Abuse and Neglect · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Law · Legal principles and applications · Public Administration

  • Is there a Role for Adult Protection Services in the Lives of Young People with Disabilities Transitioning from Out-of-home Care

    Karen Broadley•Australian Social Work•2014

  • Ensuring human rights for persons with intellectual disabilities

    Kjersti Skarstad•The International Journal of…•2018

  • Family caregivers and decision-making for older people with dementia

    Open Access•Lottie Giertz, Ulla Melin Emilsson et al.•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2019

  • Modernising Adult Protection in an Age of Choice

    Open Access•John Chesterman•Australian Journal of Public…•2014

  • Taking Control

    John Chesterman•Australian Social Work•2015

  • Identity as Discourse

    Open Access•Michal Barel, Israel Doron et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2021

  • The Shift to the Rights Model of Disability in the EU and Canada

    R Daniel Kelemen, Lisa Vanhala•Regional & Federal Studies•2010

  • The Review of Victoria's Guardianship Legislation

    Open Access•John Chesterman•Australian Journal of Public…•2010

  • Risk and new exclusions in community mental health practice

    Anne-Maree Sawyer, Anne‐maree Sawyer•Australian Social Work•2008

  • Risk and Social Work Practice

    David Green•Australian Social Work•2007

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2014 - 2021 (8)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae