Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Engaging in Small Talk

Nanotechnology Policy and Dialogue Processes in the UK and Australia

Bibliographic Data

ID11960011
AuthorsGraeme Hodges (0000-0003-3350-6019, Monash University, corresponding author), Graeme A Hodge, Diana M Bowman (0009-0008-9970-4142, Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute)
Year2007
Volume66
Issue2
Pages223-237
Publication date2007-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Public Administration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0313-6647 • E-ISSN: 1467-8500
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00530.x
OpenAlexW2093162711
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited12

This article discusses the phenomena of nanotechnology, and notes that despite high investment levels for global research and development, the public presently understands neither the implications of this emerging technology nor how it might be best governed. It considers the notion of the public interest and its place in the public policy cycle, and notes some of the specific challenges posed by this new technology. Adopting a comparative jurisdictional approach, this article maps a range of policy and dialogue activities currently underway within the United Kingdom and Australia and concludes that policy dialogue is an essential component of public policy development for all emerging technologies. While the Australian government is currently beginning this process, compared to countries such as the United Kingdom, such efforts here are still embryonic. A fuller engagement in wide‐ranging public debate is suggested as a part of protecting the public interest

Government (linguistics · Political science · Process (computing · Public engagement · Public fund · Public interest · Public investment · Public policy · Public relations · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Law · Public Administration · Science, Research, and Medicine · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

  • Environmental Reform Organizations and Undone Science in the United States

    David J He•Science as Culture•2010

  • Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology

    Open Access•Mihail C Roco, William Sims Bainbridge•Societal Implications of…•2001

  • The GMO-Nanotech (Dis)Analogy

    Open Access•Ronald Sandler, W David Kay•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2006

  • In the Chamber of Risks

    William Lei, William Leiss•In the Chamber of Risks•2001

  • Strengths of Public Dialogue on Science‐related Issues

    Roland Jackson, Fiona Barbagallo et al.•Critical Review of International…•2005

  • Accountability in the Privatised State

    Open Access•Graeme Hodges•Alternative Law Journal•2004

  • Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation

    Open Access•Phil Macnaghten, Matthew Kearnes et al.•Science Communication•2005

Citations per year0.06
Citation span2010 - 2010 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae