Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Doing wellbeing policy

A discussion on public policy making for integrative prosperity

Bibliographic Data

ID11960412
AuthorsJames A Gordon (0000-0002-6656-2335, Research School of Management, College of Business and Economics The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume83
Issue1
Pages134-139
Publication date2024-02-25
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Public Administration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0313-6647 • E-ISSN: 1467-8500
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1467-8500.12631
OpenAlexW4392165648
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited8

Focusing on holistic wellbeing rather than solely economic prosperity is becoming ever more popular among policy makers, both in Australia and New Zealand, and elsewhere. And yet, turning a complex set of system‐level indicators of wellbeing into actionable policy requires us to rethink how we develop, implement, and evaluate policy. In this article, I review the current trends in wellbeing, including developments in the measurement and tracking of wellbeing, and offer practical steps for integrating actionable wellbeing outcomes into future policymaking processes. Points for practitioners Focusing on wellbeing as part of the policy making process is becoming more popular among governments, including in Australia and New Zealand. The New Zealand Government has been doing wellbeing budgets since 2019 while the Australian Government released a new wellbeing framework in 2023. Wellbeing policy represents an approach to policy making that aims to maximize the general health and happiness of a target population on both subjective and objective measures of wellbeing. This includes both economic and non‐economic measures of prosperity and wellbeing. There are many ways of tracking the wellbeing effect of policy and so choosing the right framework is important for effective wellbeing policy making. This starts with a wellbeing purpose for the policy and a clear and concise definition of wellbeing. Doing wellbeing policy requires a good understanding of what wellbeing represents and how it is measured. You need relevant and measurable indicators of wellbeing, an evaluation strategy, and the ability to reflect and innovate as part of an iterative policy making process

Economic growth · Economics · Government (linguistics · Happiness · Political science · Process (computing · Prosperity · Public economics · Public policy · Public relations · Computer Science · Employment and Welfare Studies · Health disparities and outcomes · Law · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

  • Sentiment analysis in public health

    Open Access•Ismael Villanueva-Miranda, Yang Xie et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • Subjective Wellbeing, Objective Wellbeing and Inequality in Australia

    Open Access•M Western, Wojtek Tomaszewski et al.•PLoS ONE•2016

  • The social cohesion investment

    Open Access•Fanny Lalot, Dominic Abrams et al.•Journal of Community & Applied…•2021

  • Opportunities to enhance relational wellbeing through the National Disability Insurance Scheme

    Open Access•A Meltzer, Laura Davy•Australian Journal of Public…•2019

  • Beyond the bubble that is Robodebt

    Open Access•Valerie Braithwaite•Australian Journal of Social Issues•2020

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae