Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Laissez‐faire leadership, red tape and the meaningful work paradox

Bibliographic Data

ID11960520
AuthorsAbid Hussain (0009-0002-8870-7109, School of Business and Law Edith Cowan University Joondalup Western Australia Australia, corresponding author), Esmé Franken (0000-0001-6869-3155, School of Business and Law Edith Cowan University Joondalup Western Australia Australia)
Year2025
Publication date2025-11-06
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Public Administration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0313-6647 • E-ISSN: 1467-8500
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1467-8500.70019
OpenAlexW4415960404
LanguageEN
References cited67

While meaningful work is widely recognised as a driver of job satisfaction, the role of leadership style and bureaucratic constraints in shaping this relationship remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by investigating how laissez‐faire leadership and red tape moderate the meaningful work–job satisfaction relationship among Australian public sector employees ( N = 277). The findings reveal that laissez‐faire leadership strengthens this relationship, suggesting that the autonomy it provides enhances the benefits of meaningful work, contrary to its traditionally negative portrayal. In contrast, red tape significantly weakens the relationship, highlighting the adverse effects of bureaucratic inefficiencies. These results confirm that meaningful work is a strong predictor of job satisfaction, but its impact is highly dependent on organisational context. Given the occupational composition of the sample, the findings are most applicable to public sector roles characterised by higher discretion and autonomy. By challenging conventional views of laissez‐faire leadership as detrimental, this study contributes to leadership and public administration research, demonstrating that its effects can be contingent on work meaningfulness and job autonomy. The findings emphasise the need for public sector reforms to reduce bureaucratic constraints and develop leadership approaches that balance autonomy with structured support. Future research should further explore these dynamics across diverse occupational groups and governance contexts for broader applicability and to refine leadership and organisational policies. Points for practitioners Laissez‐faire leadership can enhance job satisfaction when meaningful work is present; therefore, public sector leaders should consider providing employees with greater autonomy and flexibility, especially when tasks are intrinsically motivating. Red tape erodes the positive effects of meaningful work, so reforms aimed at streamlining processes and reducing administrative burdens are essential. Promoting meaningful work by aligning organisational objectives with employees’ personal and societal values can significantly boost job satisfaction, especially in sectors like public service where mission alignment is crucial. While laissez‐faire leadership may work well in certain environments, managers should balance autonomy with appropriate support to maximise job satisfaction and engagement

Autonomy · Bureaucracy · Corporate governance · Discretion · Job satisfaction · Leadership style · Public sector · Shared leadership · Work (physics · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Work-Family Balance Challenges · Workplace Spirituality and Leadership

  • Employees without a Cause

    Adam M Grant•International Public Management…•2008

  • A Meta-Analytic Test of the Challenge Stressor–Hindrance Stressor Framework

    Jeffery A LePine, Nathan P Podsakoff et al.•Academy of Management Journal•2005

  • Developing and investigating the use of single-item measures in organizational research.

    Gwenith G Fisher, Russell A Matthews et al.•Journal of Occupational Health…•2016

  • Fostering meaningful work in organizations

    Open Access•Evgenia I Lysova, Blake A Allan et al.•Journal of Vocational Behavior•2019

  • Psychological safety

    Open Access•Alexander Newman, Ross Donohue et al.•Human Resource Management Review•2017

  • Exploring the Job Demands–Resources Model of Work Engagement in Government

    Open Access•R T Borst, Peter M Kruyen et al.•Review of Public Personnel…•2019

  • Public Leadership

    Rick Vogel, Doris Masal•Public Management Review•2015

  • On the meaning of work

    Open Access•Brent D Rosso, Kathryn H Dekas et al.•Research in Organizational Behavior•2010

  • Red Tape and Public Service Motivation

    Open Access•Patrick G Scott, Sanjay K Pandey•Review of Public Personnel…•2005

  • Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout

    Eean R Crawford, Eean Crawford et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2010

  • Making Sense of Public Value

    Jonathan Alford, John Alford et al.•International Journal of Public…•2009

  • Measuring Meaningful Work

    Open Access•Michael F Steger, Bryan J Dik et al.•Journal of Career Assessment•2012

  • The Job Demands‐Resources model

    Open Access•Arnold B Bakker, Evangelia Demerouti•Journal of Managerial Psychology•2007

  • The relationship between laissez‐faire leadership and burnout

    Open Access•Muhammad Usman, Moazzam Ali et al.•Canadian Journal of Administrative…•2020

  • Where to for Public Value? Taking Stock and Moving On

    Janine O’flynn•International Journal of Public…•2021

  • Red Tape

    Sanjay K Pandey, Patrick G Scott•Journal of Public Administration…•2002

  • Crossing the line

    Open Access•Angela R Grotto, Maura J Mills•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2023

  • Administrative burden as a constraint on freedom in the modern welfare state

    Open Access•Jeremiah Thomas Brown, Eleanor Malbon•Australian Journal of Public…•2024

  • Creating Meaningfulness in Public Service Work

    Open Access•Robbie Waters Robichau, Billie Sandberg•The American Review of Public…•2021

  • Job Satisfaction In The Public Sector

    Open Access•Bradley E Wright, Brian S Davis•The American Review of Public…•2003

  • Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Person—Organization Fit

    Open Access•Bradley E Wright, Sanjay K Pandey•Administration & Society•2008

  • Leadership and Meaningful Work in the Public Sector

    Open Access•Lidewij Tummers, Lars G Tummers et al.•Public Administration Review•2013

  • Relational job characteristics and job satisfaction of public sector employees

    Open Access•Bram Steijn, Joris Van Der Voet•Public Administration•2017

  • Recovering the Craft of Public Administration

    Open Access•Roderick A W Rhodes•Public Administration Review•2015

  • Feeling out’ the rules

    Open Access•Randall S Davis, Sanjay K Pandey•Public Administration Review•2023

  • The Motivational Bases of Public Service

    James L Perry, Lois Recascino Wise•Public Administration Review•1990

  • Red Tape, Organizational Performance, and Employee Outcomes

    Open Access•Bert George, Sanjay K Pandey et al.•Public Administration Review•2020

  • A Theory Of Government “Red Tape

    Barry Bozeman•Journal of Public Administration…•1993

  • Why Elephants Gallop

    Gene A Brewer, Sally Coleman Selden et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2000

  • Red Tape and Public Employees

    L Dehart-Davis, Leisha Dehart‐davi et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2005

  • The Importance of Ethical Leadership and Personal Control in Promoting Improvement-Centered Voice among Government Employees

    Hassan, Shahidul Hassan•Journal of Public Administration…•2015

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae