Mitigation Targets, Burden Sharing and the Role of Economic Modeling in Climate Policy

Bibliographic Data

ID11960784
AuthorsAndrew Macintosh (0000-0001-5700-7105, Australian National University College of Law, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume73
Issue2
Pages164-180
Publication date2014-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Public Administration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0313-6647 • E-ISSN: 1467-8500
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1467-8500.12074
OpenAlexW2164622368
LanguageEN
References cited30

Within Australian climate policy, the dominant framework for determining national emission reduction targets has been ‘burden sharing’. The prevailing view, both within and outside government, has been that there should be a rough equivalence in the costs that countries bear in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, at least where countries share similar wealth and capacity traits. This article looks at the practical problems with this approach that stem from its reliance on economic modeling. It is contended that any principled approach to target setting should strive for objectivity but that burden sharing based on projected welfare losses cannot provide this. To illustrate the fallibility of the economic projections that are done for these purposes, the article reviews how one of the greenhouse reporting sectors, known as land use, land‐use change and forestry, has been dealt with in the modelling exercises that have been done in Australia for climate policy purposes

Business · Climate change · Climate policy · Economic welfare · Economics · Environmental economics · Environmental resource management · Equivalence (formal languages · Government (linguistics · Greenhouse gas · Natural resource economics · Objectivity (philosophy · Public economics · Welfare · Climate Change Policy and Economics · demographic modeling and climate adaptation · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub