What can we learn from disability policy to advance our understanding of how to operationalise intersectionality in Australian policy frameworks
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11961358 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Shona Bate (0000-0003-3976-0253, Social Policy Research Centre University of New South Wales (Sydney) Kensington New South Wales Australia, autor correspondente), Rosemary Kayess (Social Policy Research Centre University of New South Wales (Sydney) Kensington New South Wales Australia), Ilan Katz (0000-0001-9002-0205, Social Policy Research Centre University of New South Wales (Sydney) Kensington New South Wales Australia) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-07-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Australian Journal of Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0313-6647 • E-ISSN: 1467-8500 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-8500.12648 |
| OpenAlex | W4400663627 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 20 |
Intersectional theory recognises inequity is rarely the result of one social identity; social identities, and their interaction with context and power relations, offer some protective factors, while marginalises others. Taking an intersectional approach to social policy has the potential to provide deeper insights in terms of identifying and responding to needs, and understanding the impact of policies and specific interventions for diverse people. While Australian social policies, such as national strategies, are beginning to recognise inequity is likely to be higher for some social identities than others, a recent review of Australian policy and how it responds to people with disability suggests policies do not yet appear to take an intersectional approach. Drawing on this review, we discuss the challenges in operationalising intersectionality, explore how they may be overcome, and identify considerations for scholars and future research opportunities to advance our understanding of how to operationalise intersectionality in social policy in Australia. We suggest intersectionality requires a broader cultural shift across society and professions to recognise people have multiple identities, statuses, and life circumstances, and the way they interact with the context and power relations affects how they experience life. Points for practitioners Intersectionality recognises the interaction between social identities, context, and power relations. The research note aims to advance our understanding of how to operationalise intersectionality in Australian social policy. This note builds on a review of Australian policy frameworks and whether they take an intersectional approach to addressing disability. The research note identifies considerations for researchers and research opportunities. A broader cultural shift across society is required to recognise how different factors affect how people experience life
Context (archaeology · Identity (music · Intersectionality · Political science · Power (physics · Public relations · Sociology · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Social Policy and Reform Studies
The Difference That Power Makes
The Palgrave Handbook of Intersectionality in Public Policy
Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex
Intersectionality and Human Rights Law
An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework
Is there a role for hybrid service provision in place‐based initiatives within the human services sector? Findings from an Australian exploratory study
Mapping the Margins
Intersectionality and Public Policy
The politics of intersectional practice
Has Intersectionality Reached its Limits? Intersectionality in the UN Human Rights Treaty Body Practice and the Issue of Ambivalence
Intersectionality
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |