Thinking Strategically in Federal Policy
Defining the Attributes of High‐level Policies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11962617 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nadeem Samnakay (0000-0001-8160-919X, Australian National University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 106-121 |
| Publication date | 2016-05-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Journal of Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0313-6647 • E-ISSN: 1467-8500 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-8500.12199 |
| OpenAlex | W2391713540 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 27 |
Governments frequently develop policies that are strategic in nature. Strategic issues at the national level are those requiring long timeframes for impact, coordinated approaches across multiple tiers of government, are cross‐sectoral, and require systemic approaches to design and implementation. Yet the process of how national strategic polices are developed and implemented in Australia is unclear, and largely unattended in the literature. This paper provides a foundation to understanding the characteristics of strategic polices and approaches to their development. Five national policies are compared (National Competition Policy, National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development, the Strategic Roadmap for Australian Research Infrastructure, Australia in the Asian Century, and the National Food Plan) and discussed. An analytical framework is constructed and key attributes of strategic policy identified
Business · Competition (biology · Government (linguistics · International trade · National government · National Policy · Plan (archaeology · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Process management · Strategic development · Strategic planning · Strategic thinking · Sustainable development · Computer Science · Policy Transfer and Learning · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Marketing
Sustainability
Institutionalising social learning
The Evolution of a ‘Meta-Policy’
Sustainable development
The meaning of strategy in the public sector
Strategic Thinking, Shared Meaning‐Making and the Interpretive Turn in Policy ‐ A Case Study
Program Strategy and Coalition Building as Facets of New Public Management
Dilemmas of Federalism and the Dynamics of the Australian Case (联邦制的困境以及澳大利亚联邦制动态)
National Competition Policy
The Greening of the Grey
National Competition Policy
National Competition Policy, Regulatory Reform & Australian Federalism
State and Territory Government Strategic Plans
Systems theory and policy practice
Prolegomena to policy sciences
Rethinking Overlap and Duplication
"The Science of "Muddling Through
Implementing a Meta-Policy
Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation
The limits of markets
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |