The Control of Natural Resources through the Trade and Commerce Power and Proprietary Rights
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11969866 |
|---|---|
| Authors | S I Bushnell (0000-0002-8534-3541, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1980 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 313-313 |
| Publication date | 1980-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Public Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0317-0861 • E-ISSN: 1911-9917 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3550001 |
| OpenAlex | W2044951656 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 1 |
The vitally important question of who controls natural resources under our Constitution the Provinces or the Dominion is considered in this paper. The recent Potash case provides a focus for the discussion of the Dominion's Trade and Commerce power, and the extent to which it has been expanded by the Supreme Court. The statement made by The Chief Justice in the Potash case that he was not considering proprietary rights inspired the latter part of the paper which looks at the issue of the proprietary rights of the Provinces over natural resources as a basis for control. A consideration of the issues points to the conclusion that authority rests with the Dominion under the Constitution
Business · Commerce · Control (management · Geography · Industrial organization · International trade · Natural (archaeology · Natural resource · Political science · Power (physics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Computer Science · Law · Legal Issues in South Africa · Legal principles and applications
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,09 |
| Citation span | 1981 - 1993 (13) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |