Nähe und Distanz
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11982038 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ute Frevert (Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung Lentzeallee 94 14195 Berlin Deutschland, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 379-390 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-09 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Geschichte und Gesellschaft (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0340-613X • E-ISSN: 2196-9000 |
| Publisher | Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.13109/gege.2020.46.3.379 |
| OpenAlex | W3106213826 |
| Language | EN |
Rules on maintaining physical distance introduced during the current pandemic have affected citizens’ social behavior. What modern society considers the “correct” relationship between closeness and distance has been widely discussed since at least the turn of the last century. “Cool,” distant society is contrasted with “warm” communities based on closer bonds. Processes that reverse social differentiation can currently be observed on several levels, and tribalisms are increasingly reasserting themselves. To counter these trends, the article borrows from older behavioral teachings to advocate a new, positive concept of “distanced closeness”
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Closeness · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Criminology · Economics · Pandemic · Political science · Positive economics · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 · Social distance · Sociology · History · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychoanalysis and Social Critique · Psychology · Social Psychology · Sociology and Education Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|