There is always Aufhebung.” Derrida’s reading of Hegel before Glas
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11993447 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ramón Mistral (Universidad Complutense de Madrid, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 881-910 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Filozofija i drustvo (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0353-5738 • E-ISSN: 2334-8577 |
| Publisher | National Library of Serbia (PUBLISHER • RS) |
| DOI | 10.2298/fid2404881m |
| OpenAlex | W4406470008 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
This article aims to reconstruct Jacques Derrida?s relationship to Hegelian philosophy as established prior to the publication of Glas (1974). During the late 1960s, a moment in whi?ch the philosophical context was marked by a strong anti-Hegelianism, Derrida?s deconstru?ction was received as the opposite of Hegel?s speculative idealism. While this opposition became the most accepted version of the French philosopher?s position towards Hegel, there are discernible affinities between the two thinkers. This paper analyzes the texts dedicated to Hegel before 1974: ?Le probl?me de la gen?se dans la ph?nomenologie de Husserl?, ?De l??conomie restreinte ? l??conomie g?n?rale. Un h?g?lianisme sans r?serve? and ?Le Puits et la pyramide. Introduction ? la s?miologie de Hegel?. It demonstrates that despite an appa?rent explicit rejection of dialectical thinking, Derrida consistently acknowledged its relevan?ce, declaring a unilateral break as impossible, and, at least during the early stages of his ca?reer, conceived the possibility of a deconstructive interpretation of Hegel?s thought
Art · Epistemology · Hegelianism · Linguistics · Literature · Reading (process · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel · Philosophy · Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |