Modal logic in integrative philosophical practice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11993662 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Aleksandar Fatić (0000-0002-5672-7183, University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 424-437 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Filozofija i drustvo (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0353-5738 • E-ISSN: 2334-8577 |
| Publisher | National Library of Serbia (PUBLISHER • RS) |
| DOI | 10.2298/fid2303424f |
| OpenAlex | W4387015946 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 4 |
The paper discusses the differences between a practical emphasis on binary logic on the one hand, and modal logic, on the other, specifically in the fields of philosophical practice and psychotherapy. Although studies of practical applications of modal logic in the helping professions are recent, the discussion largely revolves around the controversial application of modality in psychotherapy by C.G. Jung and Lacan?s psychoanalysis. The present argument touches on some of the conceptual dilemmas associated with the relationship between logical modality, intuition and scientificity in psychotherapy, all of which are a part of the philosophical foundation of psychotherapy
Argument (complex analysis · Cognitive science · Epistemology · Foundation (evidence · Intuition · Modal · Modal logic · Modality (human–computer interaction · Philosophical logic · Sociology · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Computer Science · Medicine · Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel · Philosophy · Philosophy, Science, and History · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |