Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Sexist Ideology and Endorsement of Men’s Control Over Women’s Decisions in Reproductive Health

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12005136
AutoresAino Petterson (0000-0003-2270-1222, University of Kent, autor correspondente), Robbie M Sutton (0000-0003-1542-1716, University of Kent)
Ano2017
Volume42
Fascículo2
Páginas235-247
Data de publicação2017-12-15
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPsychology of Women Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0361-6843 • E-ISSN: 1471-6402
EditoraSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0361684317744531
OpenAlexW4244663676
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas21
Referências citadas30

Feminist scholars have argued that men’s control over women’s reproductive autonomy is a central feature of male dominance. Building on recent research that shows sexist ideology informs support for restricting women’s reproductive autonomy, we examined the relation of sexism and the belief that men should be able to restrict the behavior of women. Study 1 ( N = 366 undergraduate psychology students in the United Kingdom) and Study 2 ( N = 281 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers in the United States) showed that controlling for various demographics and ideological measures (e.g., right-wing authoritarianism, support for abortion rights), hostile sexism was related to support for men having the right to prevent their pregnant partner from having an abortion. Further, hostile sexism was related to the endorsement of men’s right to withdraw financial support for the child if a woman chooses not to terminate her pregnancy. Hostile sexism was also uniquely related to support for men’s right to veto their female partner’s decisions during pregnancy and childbirth. The present studies show that hostile sexism is associated with perceptions that men have the right to constrain women’s reproductive choices. Our findings highlight the adverse pressures on women’s reproductive autonomy, including sexist ideology, and may suggest that practitioners should be mindful of this when assisting women in discussing reproductive questions. Further, by creating awareness about the different factors that shape the perception of men’s role in reproductive decisions, sexual health educators could potentially help affirm women’s autonomy in reproductive health. Additional online materials for this article (measures used in this study) are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684317744531 . Data files, together with syntax detailing the statistical analyses, are available at https://osf.io/vwjus/ . Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available on PWQ's website at http://journals.sagepub.com/page/pwq/suppl/index

Abortion · Autonomy · Developmental psychology · Dominance (genetics · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Population · Pregnancy · Reproductive health · Reproductive rights · Sociology · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Demography · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Gender Studies · Law · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • The indirect moderating effects of racial bias in the context of abortion attitudes and mock healthcare delivery decisions

    Open Access•Andrew S Franks, Yi Jenny Xiao•Analyses of Social Issues and…•2025

  • Reproductive labour, abortion bans, and techno-feudalism

    Open Access•Anastasia Rousaki•Theory & Psychology•2026

  • U.S. men's views about women's and men's agency in the abortion decision-making process

    Open Access•Xiana Bueno, Lucrecia Mena-Meléndez et al.•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2026

  • Be Fruitful and Multiply? Complementarianism, Pronatalism, and Suppression of Reproductive Rights

    Open Access•Brooklyn Walker, Paul A Djupe•Journal for the Scientific Study…•2026

  • They Say, “If You Don’t Relax…You’re Going to Make Something Bad Happen”

    Open Access•J L M Mccoyd, Laura Curran et al.•Psychology of Women Quarterly•2019

  • “Sport Belongs to Everyone… But Not During Pregnancy”

    Open Access•Mirjam Raudasoja, Tatiana V Ryba•Sex Roles•2024

  • How Familism and Hostile and Benevolent Sexism Shape Attitudes Toward Legal Abortion Among Latinx and non-Latinx Adults in the United States

    Open Access•Xiana Bueno, Beyza E Buyuker et al.•Sex Roles•2025

  • Punishing Women for Miscarriage

    Open Access•Jocelyn Chalmers, Leif Woodford et al.•Sex Roles•2024

  • Hostile, Benevolent, Implicit

    Open Access•Claire Gothreau, Kevin Arceneaux et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2022

  • From “Bad” and “Good” Motivations to Abort to “Bad” and “Good” Women

    Open Access•Maria Giuseppina Pacilli, Federica Spaccatini et al.•Sexuality Research and Social…•2024

  • Religiosity and Homophobia

    Open Access•Shubham Singhal, Vishal Gupta•Sexuality Research and Social…•2022

  • The Association Between Gender Role Norms and Abortion Stigma Among Chinese Heterosexual Adults in Romantic Relationships

    Open Access•Ting Wu, Yanchen Su et al.•Sexuality Research and Social…•2023

  • Breast is Best, but Where? Hostile Sexism Underlies Men's Opposition to Breastfeeding in Public

    Open Access•Yanshu Huang, C G Sibley et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2020

  • When assisted reproductive technology (ART) opens the door for inclusivity in a highly charged cultural milieu

    Open Access•Gerald Mirirai Mabweazara, Karin Hammarberg et al.•Culture Health & Sexuality•2025

  • The Gender Conservatism of Pro-life Activists

    Eric Swank•Women & Politics•2021

  • Hostile Sexism and Abortion Attitudes in Contemporary American Public Opinion

    Open Access•Anne Cizmar, Kerem Ozan Kalkan•Politics & Gender•2023

  • Abortion Attitudes

    Open Access•Douglas Osborne, Yanshu Huang et al.•Political Psychology•2022

  • The Rights of Man

    Open Access•Jocelyn Chalmers, Aino Petterson et al.•Political Psychology•2023

  • Gender, Religion, and Pro-Life Activism

    Open Access•Eric Swank•Politics and Religion•2020

  • Linked Fate and Social Identity

    Open Access•Kelsy Kretschmer, Christopher Stout et al.•Gender & Society•2023

  • Ambivalent sexism and relationship adjustment among young adult couples

    Open Access•Mylène Lachance-Grzela, Bingyu Liu et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2021

  • Benevolent Sexism, Attitudes Toward Motherhood, and Reproductive Rights

    Open Access•Yanshu Huang, Paul G Davies et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2016

  • Antecedents of Men’s Hostile and Benevolent Sexism

    Open Access•C G Sibley, Marc S Wilson et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2007

  • It's for Your Own Good

    Open Access•Miguel Moya, Paul Glick et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2007

  • What Motivates the Sexual Double Standard? More Support for Male Versus Female Control Theory

    Open Access•Laurie A Rudman, Janell C Fetterolf et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2013

  • Understanding the relationship between religiosity and marriage

    Kieran T Sullivan•Journal of Family Psychology•2001

  • Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy

    Open Access•Elizabeth Miller, Michele R Decker et al.•Contraception•2010

  • Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation.

    Scott E Maxwell, David A Cole•Psychological Methods•2007

  • Male involvement and maternal health outcomes

    Judith Yargawa, Jo Leonardi-Bee•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2015

  • Pedestal or Gutter

    Open Access•Stephanie Begun, N Eugene Walls•Affilia•2014

  • Ambivalent Sexism, Scriptural Literalism, and Religiosity

    Open Access•Shawn Meghan Burn, Julia Busso•Psychology of Women Quarterly•2005

  • Exposure to Sexual Economics Theory Promotes a Hostile View of Heterosexual Relationships

    Open Access•Janell C Fetterolf, Laurie A Rudman•Psychology of Women Quarterly•2016

  • Benevolent Sexism, Perceived Health Risks, and the Inclination to Restrict Pregnant Women’s Freedoms

    Open Access•Robbie M Sutton, Karen M Douglas et al.•Sex Roles•2010

  • The Precious Vessel

    Open Access•Yanshu Huang, Douglas Osborne et al.•Sex Roles•2014

  • But She Was Unfaithful

    Open Access•G Tendayi Viki, Dominic Abrams•Sex Roles•2002

  • At what sample size do correlations stabilize

    Open Access•Felix Schönbrodt, Felix D Schönbrodt et al.•Journal of Research in Personality•2013

  • The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory

    Paul Glick, Peter Glick et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1996

  • Unwilling Fathers and Abortion

    Open Access•Sally Sheldon•Modern Law Review•2003

  • Who is the mother to make the judgment

    Open Access•Sally Sheldon•Feminist Legal Studies•1993

  • Masculinities in Cyberspace

    Open Access•R M Schmitz, Emily Kazyak•Social Sciences•2016

  • An ambivalent alliance

    Paul Glick, Peter Glick et al.•American Psychologist•2001

  • Men's influences on women's reproductive health

    Open Access•Matthew R Dudgeon, M C Inhorn•Social Science & Medicine•2004

Obras citantes distintas21
Citações por ano3
Intervalo de citações2019 - 2026 (8)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 21
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae