Political explanations for the difficulties in congressional budgeting
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12007455 |
|---|---|
| Authors | P Fisher (0000-0002-9889-8116, Niagara University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 149-161 |
| Publication date | 1999-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Social Science Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0362-3319 • E-ISSN: 1873-5355 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1016/s0362-3319(99)80010-x |
| OpenAlex | W1969271326 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 7 |
Why does the congressional budget process seem so flawed? The difficulties Congress has budgeting are a direct result of the nature of a representative democracy. The American public wants contradictory budgetary actions from its representatives in Congress. Congress is a responsive body on budgetary matters, as can be seen by the strong correlations between demographics and congressional budget votes. Being responsive, however, does not make it accountable. The problems Congress faces when budgeting are in part a result of the inconsistencies of what the public says it wants. Thus, unless the contradictory desires of the American public are modified, congressional budgeting is destined to be viewed as flawed and inadequate
Economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Law · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.04 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2003 - 2003 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |