Integrated sustainable development evaluation based on human well-being indices and pressure indices

A case study of the South China Sea Neighboring Countries

Bibliographic Data

ID12008049
AuthorsZheng Zang (0000-0002-6768-393X, Nanjing University), Xinqing Zou (0000-0003-3314-9701, Nanjing University), Zou Xin-qing (South China Institute of Collaborative Innovation, corresponding author), Qiaochu Song (0000-0001-5941-8645, Nanjing University), Yali Li (0000-0001-7950-9448, Collaborative Innovation Center of South China Sea Studies, Nanjing 210093, ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center of South China Sea Studies, Nanjing, 210093, China), Teng Wang (0000-0003-2545-8619, Nanjing University, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume54
Issue3
Pages246-247
Publication date2017-05-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Social Science Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-3319 • E-ISSN: 1873-5355
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1016/j.soscij.2017.04.007
OpenAlexW2612777014
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited44

To overcome the inherent shortcomings of the human development index (HDI) and to improve the comparability of evaluation results, in this study, an evaluation indicator system of regional sustainable development pressures was constructed based on catastrophe theory. An improved catastrophe model was used to calculate the sustainable development pressure index (SPI), which was combined with the human development index (HDI) proposed by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) to explore the human welfare and sustainable development pressures in 9 countries bordering the South China Sea in the period 2003–2015 based on statistical data provided by the World Bank. It was found that during the period of investigation, the level of human welfare in the region gradually increased and the HDI steadily rose, with an average annual growth rate between 0.29% and 2.50%. The sustainable development pressures in the South China Sea neighboring region were very high, and the development models in this region can be divided into 4 types: very high level human welfare with very high sustainable development pressures; high level human welfare with very high sustainable development pressures; medium level human welfare with very high sustainable development pressures; and low level human welfare with very high sustainable development pressures. It is recommended that a country should explore its own development path based on the actual situation in the country to reduce sustainable development obstacles. Moreover, bilateral or multilateral cooperation should be actively pursued to solve the bottleneck problems that restrict regional sustainable development

Business · China · Comparability · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Human development (humanity · Human Development Index · Human Development Report · Index (typography · Political science · Sustainable development · Welfare · Computer Science · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Mathematics · Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy · Water Resources and Sustainability

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub