A Reply to Gabriele Lakomski
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12009486 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elliot W Eisner (Stanford University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1992 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 205-209 |
| Publication date | 1992-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Curriculum Inquiry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0362-6784 • E-ISSN: 1467-873X |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03626784.1992.11076097 |
| OpenAlex | W2322299323 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 6 |
As the man responsible for organizing the array of articles on objectivity, subjectivity, and relativism, I have been invited by the editor of Curriculum Inquiry to respond, if I wished, to Professor Lakomski's critique. I am grateful to Michael Connelly for the opportunity to do so. In my response, I speak for myself. Professor Lakomski has written a wide-ranging statement that moves between a direct critique of the papers and a body of philosophical material intended to instruct the reader about the current state of some
Curriculum · Epistemology · Objectivity (philosophy · Pedagogy · Relativism · Sociology · Statement (logic · Subjectivity · Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.03 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1994 - 1994 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |