Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

On the Virtues of van Manen's Argument

A Response to “Pedagogy, Virtue, and Narrative Identity in Teaching”

Bibliographic Data

ID12009903
AuthorsGary D Fenstermacher (University of Arizona, corresponding author)
Year1994
Volume24
Issue2
Pages215-220
Publication date1994-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCurriculum Inquiry (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-6784 • E-ISSN: 1467-873X
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03626784.1994.11076160
OpenAlexW2321185953
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited1

There is much to applaud in the provocative article by Max van Manen. Indeed it would be difficult for anyone to object to fostering mensenkennis, nurturing the pedagogical relation, developing virtue, and encouraging teachers to express themselves through narrative. Even the most technocratic, bureaucratic, plutocratic American policymaker is likely to assent to these noble aspirations. The problem is not with the goals themselves, but with their precise definition, means of implementation, and the subsequent appraisal of their consequences. Van Manen has many good things to say about these features as well, though there are, in my view, problems that must be acknowledged before one's heart and soul are completely absorbed by his lofty aspirations for pedagogy. Let me mention a few of the more modest concerns before moving on to matters that I regard as more serious. The first is simply a caution, applicable to all scholars in education. Diligence must be exercised when drawing a connection between the kinds of research done in a nation and the nature of teaching that takes place in that nation. Van Manen may be correct in his assertion that the educational research of many American scholars is intellectualistic, rationalistic, instrumentalist, technical, and analytical (his choice of terms). That U.S. educational research might have these characteristics does not mean that the teaching that goes on in American classrooms has these characteristics, a perceptual error that van Manen invites us to make in the early portions of the paper, then partially repairs as the piece nears its conclusion. We cannot and should notjudge the character of a nation's pedagogy from the character of that nation's pedagogical research. The second minor matter is also cautionary. North America includes Mexico. This fact is not readily apparent in van Manen's use of the term

Argument (complex analysis · Assertion · Diligence · Epistemology · Instrumentalism · Narrative · Object (grammar · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Relation (database · Sociology · Technocracy · Virtue · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy · Law · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies

  • Every Word is True

    Open Access•Janet Richards, Janet C Richards•Qualitative Report•2014

  • Actual Minds, Possible Worlds

    Jerome Bruner, Jerome S Bruner•Actual Minds, Possible Worlds•1986

Citations per year0.08
Citation span2014 - 2014 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae