The Oslo Agreement as an Obstacle to Peace
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12019364 |
|---|---|
| Authors | I S Lustick (0000-0001-7526-2679, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 61-66 |
| Publication date | 1997-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Palestine Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0377-919X • E-ISSN: 1533-8614 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2537810 |
| OpenAlex | W2073187794 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
The most sophisticated American and Israeli Jewish opponents of the Oslo peace process pay lip service to the agreement while ignoring its political content and insisting that it be understood as a legal document and a basis for pushing Israeli prerogatives and punishing Palestinian "violations." Substituting adversarial legal standards for the modus operandi of a political parternship is thus a calculated technique for destroying the credibility of the Oslo process and ensuring its demise. Right-wing opponents of Oslo in Israel and in the American Jewish community have implemented this strategy doggedly, with enormous sophistication, and with substantial success
Adversarial system · Archaeology · Credibility · Demise · Economics · Economy · General partnership · Judaism · Obstacle · Political science · Politics · Service (business · Social science · Sociology · Sophistication · History · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Middle East Politics and Society
Citizenship and the State
Israel's Regime Untangled
A righteous inconsistency
The Strengths and Weaknesses of Integrative Solutions for the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Linking Ideas and Opportunities in Contentious Politics
Building a sustainable peace
Competitive exclusion
Creative Responses to Separation
Religious—Nationalist Mobilization and State Penetration
The Failure of the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process, 1993-2000
The future of the ghost
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.39 |
| Citation span | 1998 - 2025 (28) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |