Knowing how to present yourself by knowing how to recognize false true facts
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12023992 |
|---|---|
| Autores | I Arminen (0000-0001-7347-5179, University of Helsinki, autor de correspondencia), Anna S M Heino (University of Helsinki) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 200 |
| Páginas | 211-226 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-09-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Pragmatics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0378-2166 • E-ISSN: 1879-1387 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.08.016 |
| OpenAlex | W4296831874 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 40 |
The presentation of self is a specific kind of knowledge of how to appear and speak publicly in the face of inferences of what can be drawn about how you have appeared and what you have said. As a specific case of the latter, there are things you cannot say publicly even if-or, in particular, when-they are true. This can be called recognition of false true facts. Of course, it could be claimed that knowing false true facts is just knowledge of a type of fact which does not require know-how but plain knowledge. In this article, we try to show that knowing false true facts is part of the presentation of self, which is based on know-how of telling false true facts from other facts (i.e., what you should never say publicly, however true it might be). Regarding our data, we analyze a videotaped interaction among a group of young females discussing what would be different in life if they were men. In their group discussion, they make a distinction regarding how a woman could answer that question and what could not be answered. Through defining what women could publicly say, the group performatively defines how women can present themselves. In that way, the presentation of self is based on know-how of the distinction between false true facts and other facts. At least on occasion, there does exist gender-specific expertise that delimits public performance of gender
Cognitive psychology · Epistemology · Face (sociological concept · False accusation · Linguistics · Need to know · Presentation (obstetrics · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
Collaborative turn sequences
Peripheral Vision
I.—computing Machinery and Intelligence
Encounters
Talk at work
Conversation Analysis
The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation
I.—Knowing How and Knowing that
Ethnicity without Groups
I miss my old life”
No mam. You are heterosexual’
Making Gender Relevant
Epistemics in Action
Closing of Turns in the Meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous
Categorizing the Categorizer”
Category-Sensitive Actions in Interaction
The Terms of Agreement
Expertise as a domain in interaction
Deontic authority and the maintenance of lay and expert identities during joint decision making
The tacit dimension of expertise
Expertise in interaction - Introduction
The Very Coinage of Your Brain
The agency of habitus
Giving a source or basis
Turn-opening smiles
Don't make me laugh
Action and embodiment within situated human interaction
Transformative answers
I think that's not an assumption you ought to make
Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Category accounts
Situated Learning
On Complainability
Quantifying the Tacit
Active and latent social groups and their interactional expertise
Telling My Side
You must know what you mean when you say that
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2024 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |