Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The entanglement of individuation and explanation in the discovery of xenogastrulation

Bibliographic Data

ID12028455
AuthorsAndrew Bollhagen (0000-0001-7151-1084, University of California, Davis, corresponding author), Zachary J Mayne (0000-0003-0100-0427, University of Pittsburgh, corresponding author), Christa Merzdorf (Montana State University), Christa S Merzdorf
Year2025
Volume47
Issue4
Pages53-53
Publication date2025-11-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory & Philosophy of the Life Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0391-9714 • E-ISSN: 1742-6316
PublisherSpringer Nature (PUBLISHER • SG)
DOI10.1007/s40656-025-00706-1
PMID41307786
OpenAlexW4416765303
LanguageEN
References cited30

This paper analyzes an episode of scientific work that was prompted by observations of a novel defect in early embryonic development, which was unexpectedly induced in an experimental context and has tentatively been dubbed "xenogastrulation." The researchers worked to individuate this as a novel phenomenon-both by distinguishing it from what it is not (e.g., exogastrulation) and by forming a positive conception of what it is-in order to facilitate further inquiry. Our analysis provides new insights into the role of explanatory reasoning in nascent experimental research programs. We argue that the researchers' efforts to individuate the novel phenomenon were entangled with their efforts to explain it. By this, we mean that tentative answers to the individuative question, "what is it?" also served as tentative answers to the explanatory question, "by what means does it occur?" This case study therefore demonstrates that explanation need not wait until an explanandum has been clearly individuated but instead can be deeply entangled with the process of individuating the explanandum in the first place

Context (archaeology · Individuation · Order (exchange · Phenomenon · Process (computing · Quantum entanglement · Philosophy and History of Science · Pluripotent Stem Cells Research · Xenotransplantation and immune response

  • How the Laws of Physics Lie

    Nancy Cartwright•How the laws of physics lie•1983

  • In Search of Mechanisms

    Carl F Craver, Lindley Darden•In Search of Mechanisms•2013

  • Reference and Consciousness

    John Campbell•Reference and Consciousness…•2002

  • Hempel’s Raven Revisited

    Andrew Bollhagen, Journal Of Philosophy Inc•The Journal of Philosophy•2021

  • Normal development and experimental embryology

    Open Access•James Lowe•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2016

  • Development and mechanistic explanation

    Open Access•Fabrizzio Mc Manus•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2012

  • Figuring out what is happening

    Open Access•William Bechtel, Richard Vagnino•History & Philosophy of the Life…•2022

  • Re-situations of scientific knowledge

    Open Access•James Griesemer, Carlos Andrés Barragán•History & Philosophy of the Life…•2022

  • Rip it up and start again

    Open Access•David Colaço•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2018

  • Exploratory Concept Formation and Tool Development in Neuroscience

    Open Access•Philipp Haueis•Philosophy of Science•2023

  • Phenomena and Objects of Research in the Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences

    Open Access•Uljana Feest•Philosophy of Science•2017

  • Explaining Evolutionary Innovations and Novelties

    Open Access•Alan C Love•Philosophy of Science•2008

  • The Interdisciplinary Entanglement of Characterization and Explanation

    Max Dresow, Alan C Love•The British Journal for the…•2025

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae