Controlling systems and controlling legacies
Barbara McClintock’s 1961 conversation with two bacterial geneticists
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12029015 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Qinyan Wu (0000-0002-1891-2492, University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 31-31 |
| Publication date | 2024-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0391-9714 • E-ISSN: 1742-6316 |
| Publisher | Springer Nature (PUBLISHER • SG) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s40656-024-00631-9 |
| PMID | 39264389 |
| OpenAlex | W4402482286 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 25 |
Barbara McClintock (1902-1992), the renowned American maize geneticist, received the 1983 Nobel Prize "for her discovery of mobile genetic elements," becoming the seventh woman scientist to receive a Nobel Prize. However, Nathaniel Comfort points out that McClintock viewed her primary contribution as the elucidation of control systems, rather than the discovery of mobile elements. McClintock's interest in control systems dates back to the 1940s, and this paper investigates her 1961 conversation with François Jacob and Jacques Monod, where she sought to shape the interpretation of her work by drawing parallels between maize control systems and a bacterial system they had recently discovered. Despite McClintock's efforts, Jacob and Monod rejected her parallels and suggested that her contribution was limited to mobile elements. Through an examination of their published papers, I argue that Jacob and Monod's rejection stemmed from their failure to fully comprehend maize control systems. Disciplinary discrepancy helps explain Jacob and Monod's lack of comprehension: they were molecular geneticists working on bacteria, while McClintock was a classical geneticist studying maize. I further argue that gender played a role, as McClintock experienced the Matilda effect-the under-recognition of her contribution, reinforced by the reactions of two male geneticists, and ironically, by the award of the Nobel Prize. Control systems, stemming from McClintock's reverence for organisms, embodied what Evelyn Fox Keller defines as "gender-neutral science." This divergent view of science provides insight into why Jacob and Monod failed to grasp McClintock's work in 1961
Biology · Conversation · Geneticist · Parallels · Sociology · Communication · Evolution and Genetic Dynamics · Gene Regulatory Network Analysis · Philosophy and History of Science · Genetics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|